mctp: Don't let RTM_DELROUTE delete local routes
[ Upstream commit 76d001603c509562181f3787a7065b8e163bc7b9 ] We need to test against the existing route type, not the rtm_type in the netlink request. Fixes: 83f0a0b7285b ("mctp: Specify route types, require rtm_type in RTM_*ROUTE messages") Signed-off-by: Matt Johnston <matt@codeconstruct.com.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f1bcddbc7b
commit
812ed9b712
@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static int mctp_route_add(struct mctp_dev *mdev, mctp_eid_t daddr_start,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int mctp_route_remove(struct mctp_dev *mdev, mctp_eid_t daddr_start,
|
||||
unsigned int daddr_extent)
|
||||
unsigned int daddr_extent, unsigned char type)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct net *net = dev_net(mdev->dev);
|
||||
struct mctp_route *rt, *tmp;
|
||||
@ -777,7 +777,8 @@ static int mctp_route_remove(struct mctp_dev *mdev, mctp_eid_t daddr_start,
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(rt, tmp, &net->mctp.routes, list) {
|
||||
if (rt->dev == mdev &&
|
||||
rt->min == daddr_start && rt->max == daddr_end) {
|
||||
rt->min == daddr_start && rt->max == daddr_end &&
|
||||
rt->type == type) {
|
||||
list_del_rcu(&rt->list);
|
||||
/* TODO: immediate RTM_DELROUTE */
|
||||
mctp_route_release(rt);
|
||||
@ -795,7 +796,7 @@ int mctp_route_add_local(struct mctp_dev *mdev, mctp_eid_t addr)
|
||||
|
||||
int mctp_route_remove_local(struct mctp_dev *mdev, mctp_eid_t addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return mctp_route_remove(mdev, addr, 0);
|
||||
return mctp_route_remove(mdev, addr, 0, RTN_LOCAL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* removes all entries for a given device */
|
||||
@ -975,7 +976,7 @@ static int mctp_delroute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
|
||||
if (rtm->rtm_type != RTN_UNICAST)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
rc = mctp_route_remove(mdev, daddr_start, rtm->rtm_dst_len);
|
||||
rc = mctp_route_remove(mdev, daddr_start, rtm->rtm_dst_len, RTN_UNICAST);
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user