ice: Fix resource leak in ice_remove_rule_internal()
We don't free s_rule if ice_aq_sw_rules() returns a non-zero status. If it returned a zero status, s_rule would be freed right after, so this implies it should be freed within the scope of the function regardless. Signed-off-by: Jeb Cramer <jeb.j.cramer@intel.com> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
03af840650
commit
8132e17dfb
@ -1623,12 +1623,13 @@ ice_remove_rule_internal(struct ice_hw *hw, u8 recp_id,
|
||||
status = ice_aq_sw_rules(hw, s_rule,
|
||||
ICE_SW_RULE_RX_TX_NO_HDR_SIZE, 1,
|
||||
ice_aqc_opc_remove_sw_rules, NULL);
|
||||
if (status)
|
||||
goto exit;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Remove a book keeping from the list */
|
||||
devm_kfree(ice_hw_to_dev(hw), s_rule);
|
||||
|
||||
if (status)
|
||||
goto exit;
|
||||
|
||||
list_del(&list_elem->list_entry);
|
||||
devm_kfree(ice_hw_to_dev(hw), list_elem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user