gpio: OF: Parse MMC-specific CD and WP properties
When retrieveing CD (card detect) and WP (write protect) GPIO handles from the device tree, make sure to assign them active low by default unless the "cd-inverted" or "wp-inverted" properties are set. These properties mean that respective signal is active HIGH since the SDHCI specification stipulates that this kind of signals should be treated as active LOW. If the twocell GPIO flag is also specified as active low, well that's nice and we will silently ignore the tautological specification. If however the GPIO line is specified as active low in the GPIO flasg cell and "cd-inverted" or "wp-inverted" is also specified, the latter takes precedence and we print a warning. The current effect on the MMC slot-gpio core are as follows: For CD GPIOs: no effect. The current code in mmc/core/host.c calls mmc_gpiod_request_cd() with the "override_active_level" argument set to true, which means that whatever the GPIO descriptor thinks about active low/high will be ignored, the core will use the MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH to keep track of this and reads the raw value from the GPIO descriptor, totally bypassing gpiolibs inversion semantics. I plan to clean this up at a later point passing the handling of inversion semantics over to gpiolib, so this patch prepares the ground for that. Fow WP GPIOs: this is probably fixing a bug, because the code in mmc/core/host.c calls mmc_gpiod_request_ro() with the "override_active_level" argument set to false, which means it will respect the inversion semantics of the gpiolib and ignore the MMC_CAP2_RO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag for everyone using this through device tree. However the code in host.c confusingly goes to great lengths setting up the MMC_CAP2_RO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag from the GPIO descriptor and by reading the "wp-inverted" property of the node. As far as I can tell this is all in vain and the inversion is broken: device trees that use "wp-inverted" do not work as intended, instead the only way to actually get inversion on a line is by setting the second cell flag to GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH (which will be the default) or GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW if they want the proper MMC semantics. Presumably all device trees do this right but we need to parse and handle this properly. Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7c0d404fac
commit
81c85ec15a
@ -57,6 +57,45 @@ static void of_gpio_flags_quirks(struct device_node *np,
|
||||
enum of_gpio_flags *flags,
|
||||
int index)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Handle MMC "cd-inverted" and "wp-inverted" semantics.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMC)) {
|
||||
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cd-gpios")) {
|
||||
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cd-inverted")) {
|
||||
if (*flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) {
|
||||
/* "cd-inverted" takes precedence */
|
||||
*flags &= ~OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
|
||||
pr_warn("%s GPIO handle specifies CD active low - ignored\n",
|
||||
of_node_full_name(np));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Active low is the default according to the
|
||||
* SDHCI specification. If the GPIO handle
|
||||
* specifies the same thing - good.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
*flags |= OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "wp-gpios")) {
|
||||
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "wp-inverted")) {
|
||||
/* "wp-inverted" takes precedence */
|
||||
if (*flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) {
|
||||
*flags &= ~OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
|
||||
pr_warn("%s GPIO handle specifies WP active low - ignored\n",
|
||||
of_node_full_name(np));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Active low is the default according to the
|
||||
* SDHCI specification. If the GPIO handle
|
||||
* specifies the same thing - good.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
*flags |= OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Some GPIO fixed regulator quirks.
|
||||
* Note that active low is the default.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user