rcu: Move rnp->lock wrappers for SRCU use
This commit moves the now-generic rnp->lock wrapper macros from kernel/rcu/tree.h to kernel/rcu/rcu.h, thus allowing SRCU to use them. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf32c76540
commit
83d40bd3bc
@ -303,6 +303,59 @@ static inline void rcu_init_levelspread(int *levelspread, const int *levelcnt)
|
|||||||
cpu <= rnp->grphi; \
|
cpu <= rnp->grphi; \
|
||||||
cpu = cpumask_next((cpu), cpu_possible_mask))
|
cpu = cpumask_next((cpu), cpu_possible_mask))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Wrappers for the rcu_node::lock acquire and release.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Because the rcu_nodes form a tree, the tree traversal locking will observe
|
||||||
|
* different lock values, this in turn means that an UNLOCK of one level
|
||||||
|
* followed by a LOCK of another level does not imply a full memory barrier;
|
||||||
|
* and most importantly transitivity is lost.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* In order to restore full ordering between tree levels, augment the regular
|
||||||
|
* lock acquire functions with smp_mb__after_unlock_lock().
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* As ->lock of struct rcu_node is a __private field, therefore one should use
|
||||||
|
* these wrappers rather than directly call raw_spin_{lock,unlock}* on ->lock.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
#define raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(p) \
|
||||||
|
do { \
|
||||||
|
raw_spin_lock(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock)); \
|
||||||
|
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
|
||||||
|
} while (0)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#define raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(p) raw_spin_unlock(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#define raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(p) \
|
||||||
|
do { \
|
||||||
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock)); \
|
||||||
|
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
|
||||||
|
} while (0)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#define raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(p) \
|
||||||
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#define raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags) \
|
||||||
|
do { \
|
||||||
|
typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
|
||||||
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(rnp, lock), flags); \
|
||||||
|
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
|
||||||
|
} while (0)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#define raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags) \
|
||||||
|
do { \
|
||||||
|
typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
|
||||||
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(rnp, lock), flags); \
|
||||||
|
} while (0)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#define raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(p) \
|
||||||
|
({ \
|
||||||
|
bool ___locked = raw_spin_trylock(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock)); \
|
||||||
|
\
|
||||||
|
if (___locked) \
|
||||||
|
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
|
||||||
|
___locked; \
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#endif /* #if defined(SRCU) || !defined(TINY_RCU) */
|
#endif /* #if defined(SRCU) || !defined(TINY_RCU) */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
|
#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
|
||||||
|
@ -565,56 +565,3 @@ static inline void rcu_nocb_q_lengths(struct rcu_data *rdp, long *ql, long *qll)
|
|||||||
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
|
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
|
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
|
||||||
* Wrappers for the rcu_node::lock acquire and release.
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* Because the rcu_nodes form a tree, the tree traversal locking will observe
|
|
||||||
* different lock values, this in turn means that an UNLOCK of one level
|
|
||||||
* followed by a LOCK of another level does not imply a full memory barrier;
|
|
||||||
* and most importantly transitivity is lost.
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* In order to restore full ordering between tree levels, augment the regular
|
|
||||||
* lock acquire functions with smp_mb__after_unlock_lock().
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* As ->lock of struct rcu_node is a __private field, therefore one should use
|
|
||||||
* these wrappers rather than directly call raw_spin_{lock,unlock}* on ->lock.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
#define raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(p) \
|
|
||||||
do { \
|
|
||||||
raw_spin_lock(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock)); \
|
|
||||||
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
|
|
||||||
} while (0)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(p) raw_spin_unlock(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(p) \
|
|
||||||
do { \
|
|
||||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock)); \
|
|
||||||
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
|
|
||||||
} while (0)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(p) \
|
|
||||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags) \
|
|
||||||
do { \
|
|
||||||
typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
|
|
||||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(rnp, lock), flags); \
|
|
||||||
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
|
|
||||||
} while (0)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags) \
|
|
||||||
do { \
|
|
||||||
typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
|
|
||||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(rnp, lock), flags); \
|
|
||||||
} while (0)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(p) \
|
|
||||||
({ \
|
|
||||||
bool ___locked = raw_spin_trylock(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(p, lock)); \
|
|
||||||
\
|
|
||||||
if (___locked) \
|
|
||||||
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
|
|
||||||
___locked; \
|
|
||||||
})
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user