From 8621153cb6c8b712cfad03c0fbbbf408c1ebc6e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 18:22:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ipvlan: do not use cond_resched_rcu() in ipvlan_process_multicast() [ Upstream commit afe207d80a61e4d6e7cfa0611a4af46d0ba95628 ] Commit e18b353f102e ("ipvlan: add cond_resched_rcu() while processing muticast backlog") added a cond_resched_rcu() in a loop using rcu protection to iterate over slaves. This is breaking rcu rules, so lets instead use cond_resched() at a point we can reschedule Fixes: e18b353f102e ("ipvlan: add cond_resched_rcu() while processing muticast backlog") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Cc: Mahesh Bandewar Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c index 63b1cd0bdf0f..d5ebbf5381e9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c @@ -240,7 +240,6 @@ void ipvlan_process_multicast(struct work_struct *work) ret = netif_rx(nskb); acct: ipvlan_count_rx(ipvlan, len, ret == NET_RX_SUCCESS, true); - cond_resched_rcu(); } rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -252,6 +251,7 @@ acct: } else { kfree_skb(skb); } + cond_resched(); } }