md/raid5: clearly differentiate 'before' and 'after' stripes during reshape.
During a raid5 reshape, we have some stripes in the cache that are 'before' the reshape (and are still to be processed) and some that are 'after'. They are currently differentiated by having different ->disks values as the only reshape current supported involves changing the number of disks. However we will soon support reshapes that do not change the number of disks (chunk parity or chunk size). So make the difference more explicit with a 'generation' number. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1137354234
commit
86b42c713b
@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static void init_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, sector_t sector, int previous)
|
||||
|
||||
remove_hash(sh);
|
||||
|
||||
sh->generation = conf->generation - previous;
|
||||
sh->disks = previous ? conf->previous_raid_disks : conf->raid_disks;
|
||||
sh->sector = sector;
|
||||
stripe_set_idx(sector, conf, previous, sh);
|
||||
@ -341,7 +342,8 @@ static void init_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, sector_t sector, int previous)
|
||||
insert_hash(conf, sh);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct stripe_head *__find_stripe(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t sector, int disks)
|
||||
static struct stripe_head *__find_stripe(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t sector,
|
||||
short generation)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct stripe_head *sh;
|
||||
struct hlist_node *hn;
|
||||
@ -349,7 +351,7 @@ static struct stripe_head *__find_stripe(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t sector, in
|
||||
CHECK_DEVLOCK();
|
||||
pr_debug("__find_stripe, sector %llu\n", (unsigned long long)sector);
|
||||
hlist_for_each_entry(sh, hn, stripe_hash(conf, sector), hash)
|
||||
if (sh->sector == sector && sh->disks == disks)
|
||||
if (sh->sector == sector && sh->generation == generation)
|
||||
return sh;
|
||||
pr_debug("__stripe %llu not in cache\n", (unsigned long long)sector);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
@ -363,7 +365,6 @@ get_active_stripe(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t sector,
|
||||
int previous, int noblock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct stripe_head *sh;
|
||||
int disks = previous ? conf->previous_raid_disks : conf->raid_disks;
|
||||
|
||||
pr_debug("get_stripe, sector %llu\n", (unsigned long long)sector);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -373,7 +374,7 @@ get_active_stripe(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t sector,
|
||||
wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_stripe,
|
||||
conf->quiesce == 0,
|
||||
conf->device_lock, /* nothing */);
|
||||
sh = __find_stripe(conf, sector, disks);
|
||||
sh = __find_stripe(conf, sector, conf->generation - previous);
|
||||
if (!sh) {
|
||||
if (!conf->inactive_blocked)
|
||||
sh = get_free_stripe(conf);
|
||||
@ -3648,7 +3649,7 @@ static int make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio * bi)
|
||||
if ((mddev->delta_disks < 0
|
||||
? logical_sector >= conf->reshape_progress
|
||||
: logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress)
|
||||
&& disks == conf->previous_raid_disks)
|
||||
&& previous)
|
||||
/* mismatch, need to try again */
|
||||
must_retry = 1;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
@ -4837,6 +4838,7 @@ static int raid5_start_reshape(mddev_t *mddev)
|
||||
else
|
||||
conf->reshape_progress = 0;
|
||||
conf->reshape_safe = conf->reshape_progress;
|
||||
conf->generation++;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Add some new drives, as many as will fit.
|
||||
|
@ -198,6 +198,8 @@ struct stripe_head {
|
||||
struct hlist_node hash;
|
||||
struct list_head lru; /* inactive_list or handle_list */
|
||||
struct raid5_private_data *raid_conf;
|
||||
short generation; /* increments with every
|
||||
* reshape */
|
||||
sector_t sector; /* sector of this row */
|
||||
short pd_idx; /* parity disk index */
|
||||
short qd_idx; /* 'Q' disk index for raid6 */
|
||||
@ -348,6 +350,7 @@ struct raid5_private_data {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
sector_t reshape_safe;
|
||||
int previous_raid_disks;
|
||||
short generation; /* increments with every reshape */
|
||||
|
||||
struct list_head handle_list; /* stripes needing handling */
|
||||
struct list_head hold_list; /* preread ready stripes */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user