net/mlx5: Allocate smaller size tables for ft offload
Instead of giving ft tables one of the largest tables available - 4M, give it a more reasonable size - 64k. Especially since it will always be created as a miss hook in the following patch. Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9fb932fde
commit
891b8f3321
@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static const unsigned int ESW_POOLS[] = { 4 * 1024 * 1024,
|
||||
1 * 1024 * 1024,
|
||||
64 * 1024,
|
||||
128 };
|
||||
#define ESW_FT_TBL_SZ (64 * 1024)
|
||||
|
||||
struct mlx5_esw_chains_priv {
|
||||
struct rhashtable chains_ht;
|
||||
@ -201,7 +202,9 @@ mlx5_esw_chains_create_fdb_table(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
|
||||
ft_attr.flags |= (MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TUNNEL_EN_REFORMAT |
|
||||
MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TUNNEL_EN_DECAP);
|
||||
|
||||
sz = mlx5_esw_chains_get_avail_sz_from_pool(esw, POOL_NEXT_SIZE);
|
||||
sz = (chain == mlx5_esw_chains_get_ft_chain(esw)) ?
|
||||
mlx5_esw_chains_get_avail_sz_from_pool(esw, ESW_FT_TBL_SZ) :
|
||||
mlx5_esw_chains_get_avail_sz_from_pool(esw, POOL_NEXT_SIZE);
|
||||
if (!sz)
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
|
||||
ft_attr.max_fte = sz;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user