uprobes: Teach build_probe_list() to consider the range
Currently build_probe_list() builds the list of all uprobes attached to the given inode, and the caller should filter out those who don't fall into the [start,end) range, this is sub-optimal. This patch turns find_least_offset_node() into find_node_in_range() which returns the first node inside the [min,max] range, and changes build_probe_list() to use this node as a starting point for rb_prev() and rb_next() to find all other nodes the caller needs. The resulting list is no longer sorted but we do not care. This can speed up both build_probe_list() and the callers, but there is another reason to introduce find_node_in_range(). It can be used to figure out whether the given vma has uprobes or not, this will be needed soon. While at it, shift INIT_LIST_HEAD(tmp_list) into build_probe_list(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120729182240.GA20352@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
89133786f9
commit
891c397081
@ -939,59 +939,66 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consume
|
||||
put_uprobe(uprobe);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Of all the nodes that correspond to the given inode, return the node
|
||||
* with the least offset.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct rb_node *find_least_offset_node(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
static struct rb_node *
|
||||
find_node_in_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t min, loff_t max)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct uprobe u = { .inode = inode, .offset = 0};
|
||||
struct rb_node *n = uprobes_tree.rb_node;
|
||||
struct rb_node *close_node = NULL;
|
||||
struct uprobe *uprobe;
|
||||
int match;
|
||||
|
||||
while (n) {
|
||||
uprobe = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
|
||||
match = match_uprobe(&u, uprobe);
|
||||
struct uprobe *u = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
|
||||
|
||||
if (uprobe->inode == inode)
|
||||
close_node = n;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!match)
|
||||
return close_node;
|
||||
|
||||
if (match < 0)
|
||||
if (inode < u->inode) {
|
||||
n = n->rb_left;
|
||||
else
|
||||
} else if (inode > u->inode) {
|
||||
n = n->rb_right;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (max < u->offset)
|
||||
n = n->rb_left;
|
||||
else if (min > u->offset)
|
||||
n = n->rb_right;
|
||||
else
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return close_node;
|
||||
return n;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For a given inode, build a list of probes that need to be inserted.
|
||||
* For a given range in vma, build a list of probes that need to be inserted.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void build_probe_list(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head)
|
||||
static void build_probe_list(struct inode *inode,
|
||||
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
||||
unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
|
||||
struct list_head *head)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct uprobe *uprobe;
|
||||
loff_t min, max;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
struct rb_node *n;
|
||||
struct rb_node *n, *t;
|
||||
struct uprobe *u;
|
||||
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(head);
|
||||
min = ((loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + start - vma->vm_start;
|
||||
max = min + (end - start) - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
n = find_least_offset_node(inode);
|
||||
|
||||
for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
|
||||
uprobe = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
|
||||
if (uprobe->inode != inode)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
list_add(&uprobe->pending_list, head);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&uprobe->ref);
|
||||
n = find_node_in_range(inode, min, max);
|
||||
if (n) {
|
||||
for (t = n; t; t = rb_prev(t)) {
|
||||
u = rb_entry(t, struct uprobe, rb_node);
|
||||
if (u->inode != inode || u->offset < min)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
list_add(&u->pending_list, head);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&u->ref);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (t = n; (t = rb_next(t)); ) {
|
||||
u = rb_entry(t, struct uprobe, rb_node);
|
||||
if (u->inode != inode || u->offset > max)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
list_add(&u->pending_list, head);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&u->ref);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1021,9 +1028,8 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
||||
if (!inode)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp_list);
|
||||
mutex_lock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
|
||||
build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
|
||||
build_probe_list(inode, vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, &tmp_list);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
count = 0;
|
||||
@ -1032,11 +1038,6 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
|
||||
|
||||
if (vaddr < vma->vm_start || vaddr >= vma->vm_end) {
|
||||
put_uprobe(uprobe);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = install_breakpoint(uprobe, vma->vm_mm, vma, vaddr);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can race against uprobe_register(), see the
|
||||
@ -1092,21 +1093,17 @@ void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned lon
|
||||
if (!inode)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp_list);
|
||||
mutex_lock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
|
||||
build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
|
||||
build_probe_list(inode, vma, start, end, &tmp_list);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
|
||||
loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
|
||||
|
||||
if (vaddr >= start && vaddr < end) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* An unregister could have removed the probe before
|
||||
* unmap. So check before we decrement the count.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (is_swbp_at_addr(vma->vm_mm, vaddr) == 1)
|
||||
atomic_dec(&vma->vm_mm->uprobes_state.count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* An unregister could have removed the probe before
|
||||
* unmap. So check before we decrement the count.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (is_swbp_at_addr(vma->vm_mm, vaddr) == 1)
|
||||
atomic_dec(&vma->vm_mm->uprobes_state.count);
|
||||
put_uprobe(uprobe);
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user