docs: path-lookup: use bare function() rather than literals
As suggested by Matthew Wilcox and Jonathan Corbet, drop ``...`` literals around function names of this patchset. Signed-off-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210527091618.287093-14-foxhlchen@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ef4aa53f36
commit
8943474a41
@ -450,13 +450,13 @@ If that doesn't get a good result, it calls "``lookup_slow()``" which
|
||||
takes ``i_rwsem``, rechecks the cache, and then asks the filesystem
|
||||
to find a definitive answer.
|
||||
|
||||
As the last step of ``walk_component()``, ``step_into()`` will be called either
|
||||
As the last step of walk_component(), step_into() will be called either
|
||||
directly from walk_component() or from handle_dots(). It calls
|
||||
``handle_mounts()``, to check and handle mount points, in which a new
|
||||
handle_mounts(), to check and handle mount points, in which a new
|
||||
``struct path`` is created containing a counted reference to the new dentry and
|
||||
a reference to the new ``vfsmount`` which is only counted if it is
|
||||
different from the previous ``vfsmount``. Then if there is
|
||||
a symbolic link, ``step_into()`` calls ``pick_link()`` to deal with it,
|
||||
a symbolic link, step_into() calls pick_link() to deal with it,
|
||||
otherwise it installs the new ``struct path`` in the ``struct nameidata``, and
|
||||
drops the unneeded references.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -472,8 +472,8 @@ Handling the final component
|
||||
``nd->last_type`` to refer to the final component of the path. It does
|
||||
not call ``walk_component()`` that last time. Handling that final
|
||||
component remains for the caller to sort out. Those callers are
|
||||
``path_lookupat()``, ``path_parentat()`` and
|
||||
``path_openat()`` each of which handles the differing requirements of
|
||||
path_lookupat(), path_parentat() and
|
||||
path_openat() each of which handles the differing requirements of
|
||||
different system calls.
|
||||
|
||||
``path_parentat()`` is clearly the simplest - it just wraps a little bit
|
||||
@ -489,17 +489,17 @@ object is wanted such as by ``stat()`` or ``chmod()``. It essentially just
|
||||
calls ``walk_component()`` on the final component through a call to
|
||||
``lookup_last()``. ``path_lookupat()`` returns just the final dentry.
|
||||
It is worth noting that when flag ``LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT`` is set,
|
||||
``path_lookupat()`` will unset LOOKUP_JUMPED in nameidata so that in the
|
||||
subsequent path traversal ``d_weak_revalidate()`` won't be called.
|
||||
path_lookupat() will unset LOOKUP_JUMPED in nameidata so that in the
|
||||
subsequent path traversal d_weak_revalidate() won't be called.
|
||||
This is important when unmounting a filesystem that is inaccessible, such as
|
||||
one provided by a dead NFS server.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally ``path_openat()`` is used for the ``open()`` system call; it
|
||||
contains, in support functions starting with "``open_last_lookups()``", all the
|
||||
contains, in support functions starting with "open_last_lookups()", all the
|
||||
complexity needed to handle the different subtleties of O_CREAT (with
|
||||
or without O_EXCL), final "``/``" characters, and trailing symbolic
|
||||
links. We will revisit this in the final part of this series, which
|
||||
focuses on those symbolic links. "``open_last_lookups()``" will sometimes, but
|
||||
focuses on those symbolic links. "open_last_lookups()" will sometimes, but
|
||||
not always, take ``i_rwsem``, depending on what it finds.
|
||||
|
||||
Each of these, or the functions which call them, need to be alert to
|
||||
@ -651,9 +651,9 @@ RCU-walk finds it cannot stop gracefully, it simply gives up and
|
||||
restarts from the top with REF-walk.
|
||||
|
||||
This pattern of "try RCU-walk, if that fails try REF-walk" can be
|
||||
clearly seen in functions like ``filename_lookup()``,
|
||||
``filename_parentat()``,
|
||||
``do_filp_open()``, and ``do_file_open_root()``. These four
|
||||
clearly seen in functions like filename_lookup(),
|
||||
filename_parentat(),
|
||||
do_filp_open(), and do_file_open_root(). These four
|
||||
correspond roughly to the three ``path_*()`` functions we met earlier,
|
||||
each of which calls ``link_path_walk()``. The ``path_*()`` functions are
|
||||
called using different mode flags until a mode is found which works.
|
||||
@ -1069,8 +1069,8 @@ all the data structures it references are safe to be accessed while
|
||||
holding no counted reference, only the RCU lock. A callback
|
||||
``struct delayed_called`` will be passed to ``->get_link()``:
|
||||
file systems can set their own put_link function and argument through
|
||||
``set_delayed_call()``. Later on, when VFS wants to put link, it will call
|
||||
``do_delayed_call()`` to invoke that callback function with the argument.
|
||||
set_delayed_call(). Later on, when VFS wants to put link, it will call
|
||||
do_delayed_call() to invoke that callback function with the argument.
|
||||
|
||||
In order for the reference to each symlink to be dropped when the walk completes,
|
||||
whether in RCU-walk or REF-walk, the symlink stack needs to contain,
|
||||
@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ doesn't need to notice. Getting this ``name`` variable on and off the
|
||||
stack is very straightforward; pushing and popping the references is
|
||||
a little more complex.
|
||||
|
||||
When a symlink is found, ``walk_component()`` calls ``pick_link()`` via ``step_into()``
|
||||
When a symlink is found, walk_component() calls pick_link() via step_into()
|
||||
which returns the link from the filesystem.
|
||||
Providing that operation is successful, the old path ``name`` is placed on the
|
||||
stack, and the new value is used as the ``name`` for a while. When the end of
|
||||
@ -1136,10 +1136,10 @@ Symlinks with no final component
|
||||
|
||||
A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation.
|
||||
Both result in a new ``struct path`` (with mount and dentry) being set
|
||||
up in the ``nameidata``, and result in ``pick_link()`` returning ``NULL``.
|
||||
up in the ``nameidata``, and result in pick_link() returning ``NULL``.
|
||||
|
||||
The more obvious case is a symlink to "``/``". All symlinks starting
|
||||
with "``/``" are detected in ``pick_link()`` which resets the ``nameidata``
|
||||
with "``/``" are detected in pick_link() which resets the ``nameidata``
|
||||
to point to the effective filesystem root. If the symlink only
|
||||
contains "``/``" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all,
|
||||
so ``NULL`` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and
|
||||
@ -1157,9 +1157,9 @@ target file, not just the name of it. When you ``readlink`` these
|
||||
objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it
|
||||
has been unlinked or mounted over. When ``walk_component()`` follows
|
||||
one of these, the ``->get_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return
|
||||
a string name, but instead calls ``nd_jump_link()`` which updates the
|
||||
a string name, but instead calls nd_jump_link() which updates the
|
||||
``nameidata`` in place to point to that target. ``->get_link()`` then
|
||||
returns ``NULL``. Again there is no final component and ``pick_link()``
|
||||
returns ``NULL``. Again there is no final component and pick_link()
|
||||
returns ``NULL``.
|
||||
|
||||
Following the symlink in the final component
|
||||
@ -1177,35 +1177,35 @@ potentially need to call ``link_path_walk()`` again and again on
|
||||
successive symlinks until one is found that doesn't point to another
|
||||
symlink.
|
||||
|
||||
This case is handled by relevant callers of ``link_path_walk()``, such as
|
||||
``path_lookupat()``, ``path_openat()`` using a loop that calls ``link_path_walk()``,
|
||||
and then handles the final component by calling ``open_last_lookups()`` or
|
||||
``lookup_last()``. If it is a symlink that needs to be followed,
|
||||
``open_last_lookups()`` or ``lookup_last()`` will set things up properly and
|
||||
This case is handled by relevant callers of link_path_walk(), such as
|
||||
path_lookupat(), path_openat() using a loop that calls link_path_walk(),
|
||||
and then handles the final component by calling open_last_lookups() or
|
||||
lookup_last(). If it is a symlink that needs to be followed,
|
||||
open_last_lookups() or lookup_last() will set things up properly and
|
||||
return the path so that the loop repeats, calling
|
||||
``link_path_walk()`` again. This could loop as many as 40 times if the last
|
||||
link_path_walk() again. This could loop as many as 40 times if the last
|
||||
component of each symlink is another symlink.
|
||||
|
||||
Of the various functions that examine the final component,
|
||||
``open_last_lookups()`` is the most interesting as it works in tandem
|
||||
with ``do_open()`` for opening a file. Part of ``open_last_lookups()`` runs
|
||||
with ``i_rwsem`` held and this part is in a separate function: ``lookup_open()``.
|
||||
open_last_lookups() is the most interesting as it works in tandem
|
||||
with do_open() for opening a file. Part of open_last_lookups() runs
|
||||
with ``i_rwsem`` held and this part is in a separate function: lookup_open().
|
||||
|
||||
Explaining ``open_last_lookups()`` and ``do_open()`` completely is beyond the scope
|
||||
Explaining open_last_lookups() and do_open() completely is beyond the scope
|
||||
of this article, but a few highlights should help those interested in exploring
|
||||
the code.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Rather than just finding the target file, ``do_open()`` is used after
|
||||
``open_last_lookup()`` to open
|
||||
1. Rather than just finding the target file, do_open() is used after
|
||||
open_last_lookup() to open
|
||||
it. If the file was found in the dcache, then ``vfs_open()`` is used for
|
||||
this. If not, then ``lookup_open()`` will either call ``atomic_open()`` (if
|
||||
the filesystem provides it) to combine the final lookup with the open, or
|
||||
will perform the separate ``i_op->lookup()`` and ``i_op->create()`` steps
|
||||
directly. In the later case the actual "open" of this newly found or
|
||||
created file will be performed by ``vfs_open()``, just as if the name
|
||||
created file will be performed by vfs_open(), just as if the name
|
||||
were found in the dcache.
|
||||
|
||||
2. ``vfs_open()`` can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information
|
||||
2. vfs_open() can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information
|
||||
wasn't quite current enough. If it's in RCU-walk ``-ECHILD`` will be returned
|
||||
otherwise ``-ESTALE`` is returned. When ``-ESTALE`` is returned, the caller may
|
||||
retry with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` flag set.
|
||||
@ -1218,8 +1218,8 @@ the code.
|
||||
|
||||
will create a file called ``/tmp/bar``. This is not permitted if
|
||||
``O_EXCL`` is set but otherwise is handled for an O_CREAT open much
|
||||
like for a non-creating open: ``lookup_last()`` or ``open_last_lookup()``
|
||||
returns a non ``NULL`` value, and ``link_path_walk()`` gets called and the
|
||||
like for a non-creating open: lookup_last() or open_last_lookup()
|
||||
returns a non ``NULL`` value, and link_path_walk() gets called and the
|
||||
open process continues on the symlink that was found.
|
||||
|
||||
Updating the access time
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user