Documentation: Remove mentioning of block barriers
Remove mentioning of block barriers since they were removed. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Leonid V. Fedorenchik <leonidsbox@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d50ca07863
commit
8962786ce3
@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ Description of Contents:
|
||||
- Highmem I/O support
|
||||
- I/O scheduler modularization
|
||||
1.2 Tuning based on high level requirements/capabilities
|
||||
1.2.1 I/O Barriers
|
||||
1.2.2 Request Priority/Latency
|
||||
1.2.1 Request Priority/Latency
|
||||
1.3 Direct access/bypass to lower layers for diagnostics and special
|
||||
device operations
|
||||
1.3.1 Pre-built commands
|
||||
@ -255,29 +254,12 @@ some control over i/o ordering.
|
||||
What kind of support exists at the generic block layer for this ?
|
||||
|
||||
The flags and rw fields in the bio structure can be used for some tuning
|
||||
from above e.g indicating that an i/o is just a readahead request, or for
|
||||
marking barrier requests (discussed next), or priority settings (currently
|
||||
unused). As far as user applications are concerned they would need an
|
||||
additional mechanism either via open flags or ioctls, or some other upper
|
||||
level mechanism to communicate such settings to block.
|
||||
from above e.g indicating that an i/o is just a readahead request, or priority
|
||||
settings (currently unused). As far as user applications are concerned they
|
||||
would need an additional mechanism either via open flags or ioctls, or some
|
||||
other upper level mechanism to communicate such settings to block.
|
||||
|
||||
1.2.1 I/O Barriers
|
||||
|
||||
There is a way to enforce strict ordering for i/os through barriers.
|
||||
All requests before a barrier point must be serviced before the barrier
|
||||
request and any other requests arriving after the barrier will not be
|
||||
serviced until after the barrier has completed. This is useful for higher
|
||||
level control on write ordering, e.g flushing a log of committed updates
|
||||
to disk before the corresponding updates themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
A flag in the bio structure, BIO_BARRIER is used to identify a barrier i/o.
|
||||
The generic i/o scheduler would make sure that it places the barrier request and
|
||||
all other requests coming after it after all the previous requests in the
|
||||
queue. Barriers may be implemented in different ways depending on the
|
||||
driver. For more details regarding I/O barriers, please read barrier.txt
|
||||
in this directory.
|
||||
|
||||
1.2.2 Request Priority/Latency
|
||||
1.2.1 Request Priority/Latency
|
||||
|
||||
Todo/Under discussion:
|
||||
Arjan's proposed request priority scheme allows higher levels some broad
|
||||
@ -906,8 +888,8 @@ queue and specific I/O schedulers. Unless stated otherwise, elevator is used
|
||||
to refer to both parts and I/O scheduler to specific I/O schedulers.
|
||||
|
||||
Block layer implements generic dispatch queue in block/*.c.
|
||||
The generic dispatch queue is responsible for properly ordering barrier
|
||||
requests, requeueing, handling non-fs requests and all other subtleties.
|
||||
The generic dispatch queue is responsible for requeueing, handling non-fs
|
||||
requests and all other subtleties.
|
||||
|
||||
Specific I/O schedulers are responsible for ordering normal filesystem
|
||||
requests. They can also choose to delay certain requests to improve
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user