btrfs: add support for 4-copy replication (raid1c4)
Add new block group profile to store 4 copies in a simliar way that current RAID1 does. The profile attributes and constraints are defined in the raid table and used by the same code that already handles the 2- and 3-copy RAID1. The minimum number of devices is 4, the maximum number of devices/chunks that can be lost/damaged is 3. There is no comparable traditional RAID level, the profile is added for future needs to accompany triple-parity and beyond. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
47e6f7423b
commit
8d6fac0087
@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ struct btrfs_ref;
|
||||
* filesystem data as well that can be used to read data in order to repair
|
||||
* read errors on other disks.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Current value is derived from RAID1C3 with 3 copies.
|
||||
* Current value is derived from RAID1C4 with 4 copies.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS (3 + 1)
|
||||
#define BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS (4 + 1)
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL 8
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1937,6 +1937,8 @@ static inline int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
num_stripes = 2;
|
||||
else if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3)
|
||||
num_stripes = 3;
|
||||
else if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4)
|
||||
num_stripes = 4;
|
||||
else if (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10)
|
||||
num_stripes = 4;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -70,6 +70,18 @@ const struct btrfs_raid_attr btrfs_raid_array[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
|
||||
.bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3,
|
||||
.mindev_error = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1C3_MIN_NOT_MET,
|
||||
},
|
||||
[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C4] = {
|
||||
.sub_stripes = 1,
|
||||
.dev_stripes = 1,
|
||||
.devs_max = 0,
|
||||
.devs_min = 4,
|
||||
.tolerated_failures = 3,
|
||||
.devs_increment = 4,
|
||||
.ncopies = 4,
|
||||
.raid_name = "raid1c4",
|
||||
.bg_flag = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4,
|
||||
.mindev_error = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1C4_MIN_NOT_MET,
|
||||
},
|
||||
[BTRFS_RAID_DUP] = {
|
||||
.sub_stripes = 1,
|
||||
.dev_stripes = 2,
|
||||
|
@ -547,6 +547,8 @@ static inline enum btrfs_raid_types btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(u64 flags)
|
||||
return BTRFS_RAID_RAID1;
|
||||
else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3)
|
||||
return BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C3;
|
||||
else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4)
|
||||
return BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C4;
|
||||
else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP)
|
||||
return BTRFS_RAID_DUP;
|
||||
else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0)
|
||||
|
@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ enum btrfs_err_code {
|
||||
BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_ONLY_WRITABLE,
|
||||
BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS,
|
||||
BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1C3_MIN_NOT_MET,
|
||||
BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_RAID1C4_MIN_NOT_MET,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_IOC_SNAP_CREATE _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 1, \
|
||||
|
@ -842,6 +842,7 @@ struct btrfs_dev_replace_item {
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 (1ULL << 7)
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 (1ULL << 8)
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 (1ULL << 9)
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 (1ULL << 10)
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RESERVED (BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE | \
|
||||
BTRFS_SPACE_INFO_GLOBAL_RSV)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -854,6 +855,7 @@ enum btrfs_raid_types {
|
||||
BTRFS_RAID_RAID5,
|
||||
BTRFS_RAID_RAID6,
|
||||
BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C3,
|
||||
BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C4,
|
||||
BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -864,6 +866,7 @@ enum btrfs_raid_types {
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 | \
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 | \
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 | \
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 | \
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | \
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 | \
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP | \
|
||||
@ -872,7 +875,8 @@ enum btrfs_raid_types {
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1_MASK (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 | \
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3)
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 | \
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need a bit for restriper to be able to tell when chunks of type
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user