btrfs: s_bdev is not null after missing replace
Yauhen reported in the ML that s_bdev is null at mount, and s_bdev gets updated to some device when missing device is replaced, as because bdev is null for missing device, things gets matched up. Fix this by checking if s_bdev is set. I didn't want to completely remove updating s_bdev because the future multi device support at vfs layer may need it. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reported-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy <yauhen.kharuzhy@zavadatar.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b5255456c5
commit
8ed01abe7d
@ -569,7 +569,8 @@ static int btrfs_dev_replace_finishing(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
ASSERT(list_empty(&src_device->resized_list));
|
||||
tgt_device->commit_total_bytes = src_device->commit_total_bytes;
|
||||
tgt_device->commit_bytes_used = src_device->bytes_used;
|
||||
if (fs_info->sb->s_bdev == src_device->bdev)
|
||||
if (fs_info->sb->s_bdev &&
|
||||
(fs_info->sb->s_bdev == src_device->bdev))
|
||||
fs_info->sb->s_bdev = tgt_device->bdev;
|
||||
if (fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev == src_device->bdev)
|
||||
fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev = tgt_device->bdev;
|
||||
|
@ -1848,7 +1848,8 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path, u64 devid)
|
||||
|
||||
next_device = list_entry(root->fs_info->fs_devices->devices.next,
|
||||
struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
|
||||
if (device->bdev == root->fs_info->sb->s_bdev)
|
||||
if (root->fs_info->sb->s_bdev &&
|
||||
(root->fs_info->sb->s_bdev == device->bdev))
|
||||
root->fs_info->sb->s_bdev = next_device->bdev;
|
||||
if (device->bdev == root->fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev)
|
||||
root->fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev = next_device->bdev;
|
||||
@ -1996,7 +1997,8 @@ void btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
|
||||
next_device = list_entry(fs_info->fs_devices->devices.next,
|
||||
struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
|
||||
if (tgtdev->bdev == fs_info->sb->s_bdev)
|
||||
if (fs_info->sb->s_bdev &&
|
||||
(tgtdev->bdev == fs_info->sb->s_bdev))
|
||||
fs_info->sb->s_bdev = next_device->bdev;
|
||||
if (tgtdev->bdev == fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev)
|
||||
fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev = next_device->bdev;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user