Bluetooth: Fix bug with ERTM vars increment
All ERTM operations regarding the txWindow should be modulo 64, otherwise we confuse the ERTM logic and connections will break. Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi> Reviewed-by: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@profusion.mobi> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6337c7711
commit
8ff50ec04a
@ -3748,7 +3748,7 @@ static void l2cap_check_srej_gap(struct sock *sk, u8 tx_seq)
|
||||
l2cap_ertm_reassembly_sdu(sk, skb, control);
|
||||
l2cap_pi(sk)->buffer_seq_srej =
|
||||
(l2cap_pi(sk)->buffer_seq_srej + 1) % 64;
|
||||
tx_seq++;
|
||||
tx_seq = (tx_seq + 1) % 64;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3784,10 +3784,11 @@ static void l2cap_send_srejframe(struct sock *sk, u8 tx_seq)
|
||||
l2cap_send_sframe(pi, control);
|
||||
|
||||
new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct srej_list), GFP_ATOMIC);
|
||||
new->tx_seq = pi->expected_tx_seq++;
|
||||
new->tx_seq = pi->expected_tx_seq;
|
||||
pi->expected_tx_seq = (pi->expected_tx_seq + 1) % 64;
|
||||
list_add_tail(&new->list, SREJ_LIST(sk));
|
||||
}
|
||||
pi->expected_tx_seq++;
|
||||
pi->expected_tx_seq = (pi->expected_tx_seq + 1) % 64;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int l2cap_data_channel_iframe(struct sock *sk, u16 rx_control, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user