riscv: alternative: proceed one more instruction for auipc/jalr pair
If we patched auipc + jalr pair, we'd better proceed one more instruction. Andrew pointed out "There's not a problem now, since we're only adding a fixup for jal, not jalr, but we should future-proof this and there's no reason to revisit an already fixed-up instruction anyway." Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230115162811.3146-1-jszhang@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3af3b0039
commit
91612cfb17
@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ void riscv_alternative_fix_offsets(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len,
|
||||
|
||||
riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr(alt_ptr + i * sizeof(u32),
|
||||
insn, insn2, patch_offset);
|
||||
i++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (riscv_insn_is_jal(insn)) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user