ALSA: core: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211193910.GA4596@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e023687ca
commit
9478bd43a2
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct rate_priv {
|
||||
unsigned int pos;
|
||||
rate_f func;
|
||||
snd_pcm_sframes_t old_src_frames, old_dst_frames;
|
||||
struct rate_channel channels[0];
|
||||
struct rate_channel channels[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static void rate_init(struct snd_pcm_plugin *plugin)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user