x86: fix PTE corruption issue while mapping RAM using /dev/mem
Beschorner Daniel reported:
> hwinfo problem since 2.6.28, showing this in the oops:
> Corrupted page table at address 7fd04de3ec00
Also, PaX Team reported a regression with this commit:
> commit 9542ada803
> Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Date: Wed Sep 24 08:53:33 2008 -0700
>
> x86: track memtype for RAM in page struct
This commit breaks mapping any RAM page through /dev/mem, as the
reserve_memtype() was not initializing the return attribute type and as such
corrupting the PTE entry that was setup with the return attribute type.
Because of this bug, application mapping this RAM page through /dev/mem
will die with "Corrupted page table at address xxxx" message in the kernel
log and also the kernel identity mapping which maps the underlying RAM
page gets converted to UC.
Fix this by initializing the return attribute type before calling
reserve_ram_pages_type()
Reported-by: PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>
Reported-and-tested-by: Beschorner Daniel <Daniel.Beschorner@facton.com>
Tested-and-Acked-by: PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
731f1872f4
commit
9597134218
@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ int reserve_memtype(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned long req_type,
|
||||
req_type & _PAGE_CACHE_MASK);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_type)
|
||||
*new_type = actual_type;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For legacy reasons, some parts of the physical address range in the
|
||||
* legacy 1MB region is treated as non-RAM (even when listed as RAM in
|
||||
@ -356,9 +359,6 @@ int reserve_memtype(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned long req_type,
|
||||
new->end = end;
|
||||
new->type = actual_type;
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_type)
|
||||
*new_type = actual_type;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&memtype_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (cached_entry && start >= cached_start)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user