loop: Fold __loop_release into loop_release
__loop_release() has a single call site. Fold it there. This is currently not a huge win but it will make following replacement of loop_index_mutex more obvious. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
310ca162d7
commit
967d1dc144
@ -1641,12 +1641,15 @@ out:
|
|||||||
return err;
|
return err;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
|
static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
struct loop_device *lo;
|
||||||
int err;
|
int err;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
|
||||||
|
lo = disk->private_data;
|
||||||
if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
|
if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
|
||||||
return;
|
goto unlock_index;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||||
if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
|
if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
|
||||||
@ -1656,7 +1659,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
|
|||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
|
err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
|
||||||
if (!err)
|
if (!err)
|
||||||
return;
|
goto unlock_index;
|
||||||
} else if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound) {
|
} else if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound) {
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config,
|
* Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config,
|
||||||
@ -1667,12 +1670,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||||
}
|
unlock_index:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
|
|
||||||
__lo_release(disk->private_data);
|
|
||||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
|
mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user