mm/hugetlb: use pmd_page() in follow_huge_pmd()
Commit61f77eda9b
("mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around follow_huge_*") broke follow_huge_pmd() on s390, where pmd and pte layout differ and using pte_page() on a huge pmd will return wrong results. Using pmd_page() instead fixes this. All architectures that were touched by that commit have pmd_page() defined, so this should not break anything on other architectures. Fixes:61f77eda
"mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around follow_huge_*" Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
31f7dc7969
commit
9753412701
@ -3735,8 +3735,7 @@ retry:
|
||||
if (!pmd_huge(*pmd))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
if (pmd_present(*pmd)) {
|
||||
page = pte_page(*(pte_t *)pmd) +
|
||||
((address & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
|
||||
page = pmd_page(*pmd) + ((address & ~PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
|
||||
if (flags & FOLL_GET)
|
||||
get_page(page);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user