futex: Fix pi_state->owner serialization
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> commit c74aef2d06a9f59cece89093eecc552933cba72a upstream. There was a reported suspicion about a race between exit_pi_state_list() and put_pi_state(). The same report mentioned the comment with put_pi_state() said it should be called with hb->lock held, and it no longer is in all places. As it turns out, the pi_state->owner serialization is indeed broken. As per the new rules: 734009e96d19 ("futex: Change locking rules") pi_state->owner should be serialized by pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock. For the sites setting pi_state->owner we already hold wait_lock (where required) but exit_pi_state_list() and put_pi_state() were not and raced on clearing it. Fixes: 734009e96d19 ("futex: Change locking rules") Reported-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dvhart@infradead.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170922154806.jd3ffltfk24m4o4y@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [bwh: Backported to 4.9: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
25a678da6d
commit
9787adc793
@ -868,8 +868,6 @@ static void get_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Drops a reference to the pi_state object and frees or caches it
|
||||
* when the last reference is gone.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Must be called with the hb lock held.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -884,13 +882,15 @@ static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
|
||||
* and has cleaned up the pi_state already
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pi_state->owner) {
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, NULL);
|
||||
rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (current->pi_state_cache)
|
||||
if (current->pi_state_cache) {
|
||||
kfree(pi_state);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* pi_state->list is already empty.
|
||||
* clear pi_state->owner.
|
||||
@ -949,13 +949,14 @@ static void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We dropped the pi-lock, so re-check whether this
|
||||
* task still owns the PI-state:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (head->next != next) {
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -964,9 +965,10 @@ static void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
|
||||
WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list));
|
||||
list_del_init(&pi_state->list);
|
||||
pi_state->owner = NULL;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
get_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
|
||||
@ -1349,6 +1351,10 @@ static int attach_to_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, union futex_key *key,
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list));
|
||||
list_add(&pi_state->list, &p->pi_state_list);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Assignment without holding pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock is safe
|
||||
* because there is no concurrency as the object is not published yet.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pi_state->owner = p;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3027,6 +3033,7 @@ retry:
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* drops pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock */
|
||||
ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, pi_state);
|
||||
|
||||
put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user