fs: skip I_FREEING inodes in writeback_sb_inodes
Skip I_FREEING inodes just like I_WILL_FREE and I_NEW when walking the writeback lists. Currenly this can't happen, but once we move from inode_lock to more fine grained locking we can have an inode that's still on the writeback lists but has I_FREEING set, and we absolutely need to skip it here, just like we do for all other inode list walks. Based on a patch from Dave Chinner. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a031878670
commit
9843b76aae
@ -487,10 +487,16 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_WILL_FREE)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Don't bother with new inodes or inodes beeing freed, first
|
||||
* kind does not need peridic writeout yet, and for the latter
|
||||
* kind writeout is handled by the freer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
|
||||
requeue_io(inode);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Was this inode dirtied after sync_sb_inodes was called?
|
||||
* This keeps sync from extra jobs and livelock.
|
||||
@ -498,7 +504,6 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
|
||||
if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, wbc->wb_start))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(inode->i_state & I_FREEING);
|
||||
__iget(inode);
|
||||
pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
|
||||
writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user