net/mlx5: Add missing RDMA_RX capabilities
New flow table type RDMA_RX was added but the MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE didn't handle this new flow table type. This means that MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE returns an empty capability to this flow table type. Update both the macro and the maximum supported flow table type to RDMA_RX. Fixes: d83eb50e29de ("net/mlx5: Add support in RDMA RX steering") Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
08aa5e7da6
commit
987f6c69dd
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum fs_flow_table_type {
|
|||||||
FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX = 0X5,
|
FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX = 0X5,
|
||||||
FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX = 0X6,
|
FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX = 0X6,
|
||||||
FS_FT_RDMA_RX = 0X7,
|
FS_FT_RDMA_RX = 0X7,
|
||||||
FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX,
|
FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_RDMA_RX,
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
enum fs_flow_table_op_mod {
|
enum fs_flow_table_op_mod {
|
||||||
@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_fs(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
|
|||||||
(type == FS_FT_FDB) ? MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(mdev, cap) : \
|
(type == FS_FT_FDB) ? MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(mdev, cap) : \
|
||||||
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_RX(mdev, cap) : \
|
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_RX(mdev, cap) : \
|
||||||
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_TX(mdev, cap) : \
|
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_TX(mdev, cap) : \
|
||||||
(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
|
(type == FS_FT_RDMA_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_RDMA_RX(mdev, cap) : \
|
||||||
|
(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_RDMA_RX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user