amt: do not use amt->nr_tunnels outside of lock
amt->nr_tunnels is protected by amt->lock. But, amt_request_handler() has been using this variable without the amt->lock. So, it expands context of amt->lock in the amt_request_handler() to protect amt->nr_tunnels variable. Fixes: cbc21dc1cfe9 ("amt: add data plane of amt interface") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e882827d5b
commit
989918482b
@ -2679,7 +2679,9 @@ static bool amt_request_handler(struct amt_dev *amt, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
if (tunnel->ip4 == iph->saddr)
|
||||
goto send;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&amt->lock);
|
||||
if (amt->nr_tunnels >= amt->max_tunnels) {
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&amt->lock);
|
||||
icmp_ndo_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_HOST_UNREACH, 0);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2687,8 +2689,10 @@ static bool amt_request_handler(struct amt_dev *amt, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
tunnel = kzalloc(sizeof(*tunnel) +
|
||||
(sizeof(struct hlist_head) * amt->hash_buckets),
|
||||
GFP_ATOMIC);
|
||||
if (!tunnel)
|
||||
if (!tunnel) {
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&amt->lock);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tunnel->source_port = udph->source;
|
||||
tunnel->ip4 = iph->saddr;
|
||||
@ -2701,10 +2705,9 @@ static bool amt_request_handler(struct amt_dev *amt, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
|
||||
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&tunnel->gc_wq, amt_tunnel_expire);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&amt->lock);
|
||||
list_add_tail_rcu(&tunnel->list, &amt->tunnel_list);
|
||||
tunnel->key = amt->key;
|
||||
amt_update_relay_status(tunnel, AMT_STATUS_RECEIVED_REQUEST, true);
|
||||
__amt_update_relay_status(tunnel, AMT_STATUS_RECEIVED_REQUEST, true);
|
||||
amt->nr_tunnels++;
|
||||
mod_delayed_work(amt_wq, &tunnel->gc_wq,
|
||||
msecs_to_jiffies(amt_gmi(amt)));
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user