locks: remove extraneous IS_POSIX and IS_FLOCK tests
We know that the locks being passed into this function are of the correct type, now that they live on their own lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9cd29044bd
commit
9b8c86956d
@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ static int posix_locks_conflict(struct file_lock *caller_fl, struct file_lock *s
|
||||
/* POSIX locks owned by the same process do not conflict with
|
||||
* each other.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!IS_POSIX(sys_fl) || posix_same_owner(caller_fl, sys_fl))
|
||||
if (posix_same_owner(caller_fl, sys_fl))
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check whether they overlap */
|
||||
@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ static int flock_locks_conflict(struct file_lock *caller_fl, struct file_lock *s
|
||||
/* FLOCK locks referring to the same filp do not conflict with
|
||||
* each other.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!IS_FLOCK(sys_fl) || (caller_fl->fl_file == sys_fl->fl_file))
|
||||
if (caller_fl->fl_file == sys_fl->fl_file)
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
if ((caller_fl->fl_type & LOCK_MAND) || (sys_fl->fl_type & LOCK_MAND))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user