cpufreq: Fix per-policy boost behavior on SoCs using cpufreq_boost_set_sw()
[ Upstream commit f37a4d6b4a2c77414e8b9d25dd5ee31537ce9b00 ] In the existing code, per-policy flags don't have any impact i.e. if cpufreq_driver boost is enabled and boost is disabled for one or more of the policies, the cpufreq driver will behave as if boost is enabled. Fix this by incorporating per-policy boost flag in the policy->max computation used in cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo and setting the default per-policy boost to mirror the cpufreq_driver boost flag. Fixes: 218a06a79d9a ("cpufreq: Support per-policy performance boost") Reported-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com> Tested-by:Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> <mailto:zouyipeng@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com> <mailto:zouyipeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa92366e41
commit
9d47d2e7f8
@ -644,14 +644,16 @@ static ssize_t store_local_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
if (policy->boost_enabled == enable)
|
||||
return count;
|
||||
|
||||
policy->boost_enabled = enable;
|
||||
|
||||
cpus_read_lock();
|
||||
ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, enable);
|
||||
cpus_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
policy->boost_enabled = enable;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1419,6 +1421,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
goto out_free_policy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
|
||||
policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The initialization has succeeded and the policy is online.
|
||||
* If there is a problem with its frequency table, take it
|
||||
@ -2756,11 +2761,12 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
|
||||
|
||||
cpus_read_lock();
|
||||
for_each_active_policy(policy) {
|
||||
ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, state);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto err_reset_state;
|
||||
|
||||
policy->boost_enabled = state;
|
||||
ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, state);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
|
||||
goto err_reset_state;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
cpus_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
|
||||
freq = pos->frequency;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cpufreq_boost_enabled()
|
||||
if ((!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled)
|
||||
&& (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user