iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

blkcg: don't hold blkcg lock when deactivating policy

Browse Source 
[ Upstream commit 946b81da114b8ba5c74bb01e57c0c6eca2bdc801 ]

As described in the comment of blkcg_activate_policy(),
*Update of each blkg is protected by both queue and blkcg locks so
that holding either lock and testing blkcg_policy_enabled() is
always enough for dereferencing policy data.*
with queue lock held, there is no need to hold blkcg lock in
blkcg_deactivate_policy(). Similar case is in
blkcg_activate_policy(), which has removed holding of blkcg lock in
commit 4c55f4f9ad3001ac1fefdd8d8ca7641d18558e23.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jiang Biao 2018-04-18 08:37:18 -06:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent c5b6316c3f
commit 9d5e2d6970
1 changed files with 0 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
block/blk-cgroup.c
View File

@ -1374,17 +1374,12 @@ void blkcg_deactivate_policy(struct request_queue *q,
__clear_bit(pol->plid, q->blkcg_pols);
list_for_each_entry(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node) {
/* grab blkcg lock too while removing @pd from @blkg */
spin_lock(&blkg->blkcg->lock);
if (blkg->pd[pol->plid]) {
if (pol->pd_offline_fn)
pol->pd_offline_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]);
pol->pd_free_fn(blkg->pd[pol->plid]);
blkg->pd[pol->plid] = NULL;
}
spin_unlock(&blkg->blkcg->lock);
}
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);