iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

__d_move(): fold manipulations with ->d_child/->d_subdirs

Browse Source 
list_del() + list_add() is a slightly pessimised list_move()
list_del() + INIT_LIST_HEAD() is a slightly pessimised list_del_init()

Interleaving those makes the resulting code even worse.  And harder to follow...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Al Viro 2014-09-26 21:34:01 -04:00
parent 8527dd7187
commit 9d8cd306a8
1 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
fs/dcache.c
View File

@ -2506,8 +2506,6 @@ static void __d_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *target,
d_hash(dentry->d_parent, dentry->d_name.hash));
}
list_del(&dentry->d_u.d_child);
list_del(&target->d_u.d_child);
/* Switch the names.. */
switch_names(dentry, target);
@ -2517,15 +2515,15 @@ static void __d_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *target,
if (IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
dentry->d_parent = target->d_parent;
target->d_parent = target;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&target->d_u.d_child);
list_del_init(&target->d_u.d_child);
} else {
swap(dentry->d_parent, target->d_parent);
/* And add them back to the (new) parent lists */
list_add(&target->d_u.d_child, &target->d_parent->d_subdirs);
list_move(&target->d_u.d_child, &target->d_parent->d_subdirs);
}
list_add(&dentry->d_u.d_child, &dentry->d_parent->d_subdirs);
list_move(&dentry->d_u.d_child, &dentry->d_parent->d_subdirs);
write_seqcount_end(&target->d_seq);
write_seqcount_end(&dentry->d_seq);