tracing/kprobes: unregister_trace_probe needs to be called under mutex
Comment in unregister_trace_probe() says probe_lock will be held when it gets called. However there is a case where it might called without the probe_lock being held. Also since we are traversing the probe_list and deleting an element from the probe_list, probe_lock should be held. This was first pointed in uprobes traceevent review by Frederic Weisbecker here. (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/12/106) Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> LKML-Reference: <20100630084548.GA10325@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b83f920e17
commit
9da79ab83e
@ -925,14 +925,17 @@ static int create_trace_probe(int argc, char **argv)
|
|||||||
pr_info("Delete command needs an event name.\n");
|
pr_info("Delete command needs an event name.\n");
|
||||||
return -EINVAL;
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
mutex_lock(&probe_lock);
|
||||||
tp = find_probe_event(event, group);
|
tp = find_probe_event(event, group);
|
||||||
if (!tp) {
|
if (!tp) {
|
||||||
|
mutex_unlock(&probe_lock);
|
||||||
pr_info("Event %s/%s doesn't exist.\n", group, event);
|
pr_info("Event %s/%s doesn't exist.\n", group, event);
|
||||||
return -ENOENT;
|
return -ENOENT;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
/* delete an event */
|
/* delete an event */
|
||||||
unregister_trace_probe(tp);
|
unregister_trace_probe(tp);
|
||||||
free_trace_probe(tp);
|
free_trace_probe(tp);
|
||||||
|
mutex_unlock(&probe_lock);
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user