Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO: update dma_mask sections
We don't require drivers to guess a DMA mask that might actually match the system capabilities any more, so fix up the documentation to clear this up. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
24132a419c
commit
9eb9e96e97
@ -146,114 +146,75 @@ What about block I/O and networking buffers? The block I/O and
|
|||||||
networking subsystems make sure that the buffers they use are valid
|
networking subsystems make sure that the buffers they use are valid
|
||||||
for you to DMA from/to.
|
for you to DMA from/to.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
DMA addressing limitations
|
DMA addressing capabilities
|
||||||
==========================
|
==========================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Does your device have any DMA addressing limitations? For example, is
|
By default, the kernel assumes that your device can address 32-bits of DMA
|
||||||
your device only capable of driving the low order 24-bits of address?
|
addressing. For a 64-bit capable device, this needs to be increased, and for
|
||||||
If so, you need to inform the kernel of this fact.
|
a device with limitations, it needs to be decreased.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
By default, the kernel assumes that your device can address the full
|
Special note about PCI: PCI-X specification requires PCI-X devices to support
|
||||||
32-bits. For a 64-bit capable device, this needs to be increased.
|
64-bit addressing (DAC) for all transactions. And at least one platform (SGI
|
||||||
And for a device with limitations, as discussed in the previous
|
SN2) requires 64-bit consistent allocations to operate correctly when the IO
|
||||||
paragraph, it needs to be decreased.
|
bus is in PCI-X mode.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Special note about PCI: PCI-X specification requires PCI-X devices to
|
For correct operation, you must set the DMA mask to inform the kernel about
|
||||||
support 64-bit addressing (DAC) for all transactions. And at least
|
your devices DMA addressing capabilities.
|
||||||
one platform (SGI SN2) requires 64-bit consistent allocations to
|
|
||||||
operate correctly when the IO bus is in PCI-X mode.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For correct operation, you must interrogate the kernel in your device
|
This is performed via a call to dma_set_mask_and_coherent()::
|
||||||
probe routine to see if the DMA controller on the machine can properly
|
|
||||||
support the DMA addressing limitation your device has. It is good
|
|
||||||
style to do this even if your device holds the default setting,
|
|
||||||
because this shows that you did think about these issues wrt. your
|
|
||||||
device.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The query is performed via a call to dma_set_mask_and_coherent()::
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int dma_set_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
|
int dma_set_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
which will query the mask for both streaming and coherent APIs together.
|
which will set the mask for both streaming and coherent APIs together. If you
|
||||||
If you have some special requirements, then the following two separate
|
have some special requirements, then the following two separate calls can be
|
||||||
queries can be used instead:
|
used instead:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The query for streaming mappings is performed via a call to
|
The setup for streaming mappings is performed via a call to
|
||||||
dma_set_mask()::
|
dma_set_mask()::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
|
int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The query for consistent allocations is performed via a call
|
The setup for consistent allocations is performed via a call
|
||||||
to dma_set_coherent_mask()::
|
to dma_set_coherent_mask()::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
|
int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here, dev is a pointer to the device struct of your device, and mask
|
Here, dev is a pointer to the device struct of your device, and mask is a bit
|
||||||
is a bit mask describing which bits of an address your device
|
mask describing which bits of an address your device supports. Often the
|
||||||
supports. It returns zero if your card can perform DMA properly on
|
device struct of your device is embedded in the bus-specific device struct of
|
||||||
the machine given the address mask you provided. In general, the
|
your device. For example, &pdev->dev is a pointer to the device struct of a
|
||||||
device struct of your device is embedded in the bus-specific device
|
PCI device (pdev is a pointer to the PCI device struct of your device).
|
||||||
struct of your device. For example, &pdev->dev is a pointer to the
|
|
||||||
device struct of a PCI device (pdev is a pointer to the PCI device
|
|
||||||
struct of your device).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If it returns non-zero, your device cannot perform DMA properly on
|
These calls usually return zero to indicated your device can perform DMA
|
||||||
this platform, and attempting to do so will result in undefined
|
properly on the machine given the address mask you provided, but they might
|
||||||
behavior. You must either use a different mask, or not use DMA.
|
return an error if the mask is too small to be supportable on the given
|
||||||
|
system. If it returns non-zero, your device cannot perform DMA properly on
|
||||||
|
this platform, and attempting to do so will result in undefined behavior.
|
||||||
|
You must not use DMA on this device unless the dma_set_mask family of
|
||||||
|
functions has returned success.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This means that in the failure case, you have three options:
|
This means that in the failure case, you have two options:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1) Use another DMA mask, if possible (see below).
|
1) Use some non-DMA mode for data transfer, if possible.
|
||||||
2) Use some non-DMA mode for data transfer, if possible.
|
2) Ignore this device and do not initialize it.
|
||||||
3) Ignore this device and do not initialize it.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It is recommended that your driver print a kernel KERN_WARNING message
|
It is recommended that your driver print a kernel KERN_WARNING message when
|
||||||
when you end up performing either #2 or #3. In this manner, if a user
|
setting the DMA mask fails. In this manner, if a user of your driver reports
|
||||||
of your driver reports that performance is bad or that the device is not
|
that performance is bad or that the device is not even detected, you can ask
|
||||||
even detected, you can ask them for the kernel messages to find out
|
them for the kernel messages to find out exactly why.
|
||||||
exactly why.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The standard 32-bit addressing device would do something like this::
|
The standard 64-bit addressing device would do something like this::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
|
if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
|
||||||
dev_warn(dev, "mydev: No suitable DMA available\n");
|
dev_warn(dev, "mydev: No suitable DMA available\n");
|
||||||
goto ignore_this_device;
|
goto ignore_this_device;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Another common scenario is a 64-bit capable device. The approach here
|
If the device only supports 32-bit addressing for descriptors in the
|
||||||
is to try for 64-bit addressing, but back down to a 32-bit mask that
|
coherent allocations, but supports full 64-bits for streaming mappings
|
||||||
should not fail. The kernel may fail the 64-bit mask not because the
|
it would look like this:
|
||||||
platform is not capable of 64-bit addressing. Rather, it may fail in
|
|
||||||
this case simply because 32-bit addressing is done more efficiently
|
|
||||||
than 64-bit addressing. For example, Sparc64 PCI SAC addressing is
|
|
||||||
more efficient than DAC addressing.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here is how you would handle a 64-bit capable device which can drive
|
if (dma_set_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
|
||||||
all 64-bits when accessing streaming DMA::
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int using_dac;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!dma_set_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
|
|
||||||
using_dac = 1;
|
|
||||||
} else if (!dma_set_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
|
|
||||||
using_dac = 0;
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
dev_warn(dev, "mydev: No suitable DMA available\n");
|
|
||||||
goto ignore_this_device;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If a card is capable of using 64-bit consistent allocations as well,
|
|
||||||
the case would look like this::
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int using_dac, consistent_using_dac;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
|
|
||||||
using_dac = 1;
|
|
||||||
consistent_using_dac = 1;
|
|
||||||
} else if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
|
|
||||||
using_dac = 0;
|
|
||||||
consistent_using_dac = 0;
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
dev_warn(dev, "mydev: No suitable DMA available\n");
|
dev_warn(dev, "mydev: No suitable DMA available\n");
|
||||||
goto ignore_this_device;
|
goto ignore_this_device;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user