lockdep: Improve comments in wait-type checks
Comments in wait-type checks be improved by mentioning the PREEPT_RT kernel configure option. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210811025920.20751-1-zhouzhouyi@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
2507003a1d
commit
a2e05ddda1
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ enum lockdep_wait_type {
|
||||
LD_WAIT_SPIN, /* spin loops, raw_spinlock_t etc.. */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
|
||||
LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_LOCK, spinlock_t etc.. */
|
||||
LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* preemptible in PREEMPT_RT, spinlock_t etc.. */
|
||||
#else
|
||||
LD_WAIT_CONFIG = LD_WAIT_SPIN,
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -4671,7 +4671,7 @@ print_lock_invalid_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Verify the wait_type context.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This check validates we takes locks in the right wait-type order; that is it
|
||||
* This check validates we take locks in the right wait-type order; that is it
|
||||
* ensures that we do not take mutexes inside spinlocks and do not attempt to
|
||||
* acquire spinlocks inside raw_spinlocks and the sort.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map = {
|
||||
.name = "rcu_read_lock",
|
||||
.key = &rcu_lock_key,
|
||||
.wait_type_outer = LD_WAIT_FREE,
|
||||
.wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* XXX PREEMPT_RCU ? */
|
||||
.wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_RT implies PREEMPT_RCU */
|
||||
};
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_lock_map);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map = {
|
||||
.name = "rcu_read_lock_bh",
|
||||
.key = &rcu_bh_lock_key,
|
||||
.wait_type_outer = LD_WAIT_FREE,
|
||||
.wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_LOCK also makes BH preemptible */
|
||||
.wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_RT makes BH preemptible. */
|
||||
};
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_bh_lock_map);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user