Documentation: RISC-V: patch-acceptance: s/implementor/implementer

Implementor does appear to be a word, but it's not very common.

Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207020815.16214-5-palmer@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
This commit is contained in:
Palmer Dabbelt
2022-12-06 18:08:15 -08:00
parent 68eabc7202
commit a39c636506

View File

@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ specifications from the RISC-V foundation this means "Frozen" or
ECR. (Developers may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees ECR. (Developers may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees
that contain code for any draft extensions that they wish.) that contain code for any draft extensions that they wish.)
Additionally, the RISC-V specification allows implementors to create Additionally, the RISC-V specification allows implementers to create
their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required
to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V
Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential
@ -37,5 +37,5 @@ RISC-V extensions, we'll only consider patches for extensions that either:
- Have been implemented in hardware that is widely available, per standard - Have been implemented in hardware that is widely available, per standard
Linux practice. Linux practice.
(Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees containing (Implementers, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees containing
code for any custom extensions that they wish.) code for any custom extensions that they wish.)