Documentation: RISC-V: patch-acceptance: s/implementor/implementer
Implementor does appear to be a word, but it's not very common. Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207020815.16214-5-palmer@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
This commit is contained in:
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ specifications from the RISC-V foundation this means "Frozen" or
|
|||||||
ECR. (Developers may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees
|
ECR. (Developers may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees
|
||||||
that contain code for any draft extensions that they wish.)
|
that contain code for any draft extensions that they wish.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Additionally, the RISC-V specification allows implementors to create
|
Additionally, the RISC-V specification allows implementers to create
|
||||||
their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required
|
their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required
|
||||||
to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V
|
to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V
|
||||||
Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential
|
Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential
|
||||||
@ -37,5 +37,5 @@ RISC-V extensions, we'll only consider patches for extensions that either:
|
|||||||
- Have been implemented in hardware that is widely available, per standard
|
- Have been implemented in hardware that is widely available, per standard
|
||||||
Linux practice.
|
Linux practice.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees containing
|
(Implementers, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees containing
|
||||||
code for any custom extensions that they wish.)
|
code for any custom extensions that they wish.)
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user