iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

dlm: dlm_internal: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

Browse Source 
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo A. R. Silva 2020-03-09 10:56:08 -05:00 committed by David Teigland
parent 1d2cc5ac6f
commit a4e439a6f6
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
View File

@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ struct dlm_message {
int m_bastmode;
int m_asts;
int m_result; /* 0 or -EXXX */
char m_extra[0]; /* name or lvb */
char m_extra[]; /* name or lvb */
};
@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ struct dlm_rcom {
uint64_t rc_id; /* match reply with request */
uint64_t rc_seq; /* sender's ls_recover_seq */
uint64_t rc_seq_reply; /* remote ls_recover_seq */
char rc_buf[0];
char rc_buf[];
};
union dlm_packet {
@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ struct rcom_lock {
__le16 rl_wait_type;
__le16 rl_namelen;
char rl_name[DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN];
char rl_lvb[0];
char rl_lvb[];
};
/*