nvme_fc: revise comment on teardown
Per the recommendation by Sagi on: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2017-April/009261.html An extra reference was pointed out. There's no issue with the references, but rather a literal interpretation of what the comment is saying. Reword the comment to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5bbecdbc8e
commit
a5321aa5ef
@ -2532,10 +2532,10 @@ nvme_fc_delete_ctrl_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* tear down the controller
|
||||
* This will result in the last reference on the nvme ctrl to
|
||||
* expire, calling the transport nvme_fc_nvme_ctrl_freed() callback.
|
||||
* From there, the transport will tear down it's logical queues and
|
||||
* association.
|
||||
* After the last reference on the nvme ctrl is removed,
|
||||
* the transport nvme_fc_nvme_ctrl_freed() callback will be
|
||||
* invoked. From there, the transport will tear down it's
|
||||
* logical queues and association.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
nvme_uninit_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user