batman-adv: Don't skb_split skbuffs with frag_list
[ Upstream commit a063f2fba3fa633a599253b62561051ac185fa99 ] The receiving interface might have used GRO to receive more fragments than MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments. In this case, these will not be stored in skb_shinfo(skb)->frags but merged into the frag list. batman-adv relies on the function skb_split to split packets up into multiple smaller packets which are not larger than the MTU on the outgoing interface. But this function cannot handle frag_list entries and is only operating on skb_shinfo(skb)->frags. If it is still trying to split such an skb and xmit'ing it on an interface without support for NETIF_F_FRAGLIST, then validate_xmit_skb() will try to linearize it. But this fails due to inconsistent information. And __pskb_pull_tail will trigger a BUG_ON after skb_copy_bits() returns an error. In case of entries in frag_list, just linearize the skb before operating on it with skb_split(). Reported-by: Felix Kaechele <felix@kaechele.ca> Fixes: c6c8fea29769 ("net: Add batman-adv meshing protocol") Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> Tested-by: Felix Kaechele <felix@kaechele.ca> Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
07a4d3649a
commit
a6a73781b4
@ -478,6 +478,17 @@ int batadv_frag_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
goto free_skb;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* GRO might have added fragments to the fragment list instead of
|
||||
* frags[]. But this is not handled by skb_split and must be
|
||||
* linearized to avoid incorrect length information after all
|
||||
* batman-adv fragments were created and submitted to the
|
||||
* hard-interface
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (skb_has_frag_list(skb) && __skb_linearize(skb)) {
|
||||
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
goto free_skb;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Create one header to be copied to all fragments */
|
||||
frag_header.packet_type = BATADV_UNICAST_FRAG;
|
||||
frag_header.version = BATADV_COMPAT_VERSION;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user