x86/fpu: Invalidate FPU state after a failed XRSTOR from a user buffer
commit d8778e393afa421f1f117471144f8ce6deb6953a upstream. Both Intel and AMD consider it to be architecturally valid for XRSTOR to fail with #PF but nonetheless change the register state. The actual conditions under which this might occur are unclear [1], but it seems plausible that this might be triggered if one sibling thread unmaps a page and invalidates the shared TLB while another sibling thread is executing XRSTOR on the page in question. __fpu__restore_sig() can execute XRSTOR while the hardware registers are preserved on behalf of a different victim task (using the fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx mechanism), and, in theory, XRSTOR could fail but modify the registers. If this happens, then there is a window in which __fpu__restore_sig() could schedule out and the victim task could schedule back in without reloading its own FPU registers. This would result in part of the FPU state that __fpu__restore_sig() was attempting to load leaking into the victim task's user-visible state. Invalidate preserved FPU registers on XRSTOR failure to prevent this situation from corrupting any state. [1] Frequent readers of the errata lists might imagine "complex microarchitectural conditions". Fixes: 1d731e731c4c ("x86/fpu: Add a fastpath to __fpu__restore_sig()") Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210608144345.758116583@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
076f732b16
commit
a7748e021b
@ -369,6 +369,25 @@ static int __fpu__restore_sig(void __user *buf, void __user *buf_fx, int size)
|
||||
fpregs_unlock();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The above did an FPU restore operation, restricted to
|
||||
* the user portion of the registers, and failed, but the
|
||||
* microcode might have modified the FPU registers
|
||||
* nevertheless.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If the FPU registers do not belong to current, then
|
||||
* invalidate the FPU register state otherwise the task might
|
||||
* preempt current and return to user space with corrupted
|
||||
* FPU registers.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In case current owns the FPU registers then no further
|
||||
* action is required. The fixup below will handle it
|
||||
* correctly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD))
|
||||
__cpu_invalidate_fpregs_state();
|
||||
|
||||
fpregs_unlock();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user