perf/x86/64: Do not guess user_regs->cs, ss, sp in get_regs_user()
After recent changes to syscall entry points, user_regs->{cs,ss,sp} are always correct. (They used to be undefined while in syscalls). We can report them reliably, without guessing. Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1428671219-29341-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
54cfa458b4
commit
aa21df0424
@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* RIP, flags, and the argument registers are usually saved.
|
* These registers are always saved on 64-bit syscall entry.
|
||||||
* orig_ax is probably okay, too.
|
* On 32-bit entry points, they are saved too except r8..r11.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->ip = user_regs->ip;
|
regs_user_copy->ip = user_regs->ip;
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->cx = user_regs->cx;
|
regs_user_copy->cx = user_regs->cx;
|
||||||
@ -145,9 +145,12 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
|
|||||||
regs_user_copy->r11 = user_regs->r11;
|
regs_user_copy->r11 = user_regs->r11;
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->orig_ax = user_regs->orig_ax;
|
regs_user_copy->orig_ax = user_regs->orig_ax;
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->flags = user_regs->flags;
|
regs_user_copy->flags = user_regs->flags;
|
||||||
|
regs_user_copy->sp = user_regs->sp;
|
||||||
|
regs_user_copy->cs = user_regs->cs;
|
||||||
|
regs_user_copy->ss = user_regs->ss;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Don't even try to report the "rest" regs.
|
* Most system calls don't save these registers, don't report them.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->bx = -1;
|
regs_user_copy->bx = -1;
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->bp = -1;
|
regs_user_copy->bp = -1;
|
||||||
@ -158,7 +161,7 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* For this to be at all useful, we need a reasonable guess for
|
* For this to be at all useful, we need a reasonable guess for
|
||||||
* sp and the ABI. Be careful: we're in NMI context, and we're
|
* the ABI. Be careful: we're in NMI context, and we're
|
||||||
* considering current to be the current task, so we should
|
* considering current to be the current task, so we should
|
||||||
* be careful not to look at any other percpu variables that might
|
* be careful not to look at any other percpu variables that might
|
||||||
* change during context switches.
|
* change during context switches.
|
||||||
@ -167,9 +170,6 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
|
|||||||
task_thread_info(current)->status & TS_COMPAT) {
|
task_thread_info(current)->status & TS_COMPAT) {
|
||||||
/* Easy case: we're in a compat syscall. */
|
/* Easy case: we're in a compat syscall. */
|
||||||
regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32;
|
regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32;
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->sp = user_regs->sp;
|
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->cs = user_regs->cs;
|
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->ss = user_regs->ss;
|
|
||||||
} else if (user_regs->orig_ax != -1) {
|
} else if (user_regs->orig_ax != -1) {
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* We're probably in a 64-bit syscall.
|
* We're probably in a 64-bit syscall.
|
||||||
@ -177,17 +177,12 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
|
|||||||
* than just blindly copying user_regs.
|
* than just blindly copying user_regs.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
|
regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->sp = user_regs->sp;
|
/* usually contains return address (same as ->ip) */
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->cs = __USER_CS;
|
regs_user_copy->cx = -1;
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->ss = __USER_DS;
|
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->cx = -1; /* usually contains garbage */
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
/* We're probably in an interrupt or exception. */
|
/* We're probably in an interrupt or exception. */
|
||||||
regs_user->abi = user_64bit_mode(user_regs) ?
|
regs_user->abi = user_64bit_mode(user_regs) ?
|
||||||
PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64 : PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32;
|
PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64 : PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32;
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->sp = user_regs->sp;
|
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->cs = user_regs->cs;
|
|
||||||
regs_user_copy->ss = user_regs->ss;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
regs_user->regs = regs_user_copy;
|
regs_user->regs = regs_user_copy;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user