block: reset mapping if failed to update hardware queue count
When we increase hardware queue count, blk_mq_update_queue_map will reset the mapping between cpu and hardware queue base on the hardware queue count(set->nr_hw_queues). The mapping cannot be reset if it encounters error in blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs, but the fallback flow will continue using it, then blk_mq_map_swqueue will touch a invalid memory, because the mapping points to a wrong hctx. blktest block/030: null_blk: module loaded Increasing nr_hw_queues to 8 fails, fallback to 1 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in blk_mq_map_swqueue+0x2f2/0x830 Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000128 by task nproc/8541 CPU: 5 PID: 8541 Comm: nproc Not tainted 5.7.0-rc4-dbg+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa5/0xe6 __kasan_report.cold+0x65/0xbb kasan_report+0x45/0x60 check_memory_region+0x15e/0x1c0 __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 blk_mq_map_swqueue+0x2f2/0x830 __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x3df/0x690 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x32/0x50 nullb_device_submit_queues_store+0xde/0x160 [null_blk] configfs_write_file+0x1c4/0x250 [configfs] __vfs_write+0x4c/0x90 vfs_write+0x14b/0x2d0 ksys_write+0xdd/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x47/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x310 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 Signed-off-by: Weiping Zhang <zhangweiping@didiglobal.com> Tested-by: Bart van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ae979182eb
commit
aa880ad690
@ -3365,8 +3365,8 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
|
||||
goto reregister;
|
||||
|
||||
set->nr_hw_queues = nr_hw_queues;
|
||||
blk_mq_update_queue_map(set);
|
||||
fallback:
|
||||
blk_mq_update_queue_map(set);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
|
||||
blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(set, q);
|
||||
if (q->nr_hw_queues != set->nr_hw_queues) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user