mm/memory-failure.c: remove obsolete comment
With the introduction of mf_mutex, most of memory error handling process is mutually exclusive, so the in-line comment about subtlety about double-checking PageHWPoison is no more correct. So remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220125025601.3054511-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
77fe7f136a
commit
ae483c2006
@ -2150,12 +2150,6 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page)
|
||||
.gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check PageHWPoison again inside page lock because PageHWPoison
|
||||
* is set by memory_failure() outside page lock. Note that
|
||||
* memory_failure() also double-checks PageHWPoison inside page lock,
|
||||
* so there's no race between soft_offline_page() and memory_failure().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lock_page(page);
|
||||
if (!PageHuge(page))
|
||||
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user