bpf: do not use reciprocal divide
At first Jakub Zawadzki noticed that some divisions by reciprocal_divide were not correct. (off by one in some cases) http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/reciprocal-buggy.c He could also show this with BPF: http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/set-and-dump-filter-k-bug.c The reciprocal divide in linux kernel is not generic enough, lets remove its use in BPF, as it is not worth the pain with current cpus. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws@darkjames.pl> Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dxchgb@gmail.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba42fad096
commit
aee636c480
@ -641,10 +641,10 @@ load_ind:
|
||||
emit(ARM_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_X), ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
|
||||
/* current k == reciprocal_value(userspace k) */
|
||||
if (k == 1)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
emit_mov_i(r_scratch, k, ctx);
|
||||
/* A = top 32 bits of the product */
|
||||
emit(ARM_UMULL(r_scratch, r_A, r_A, r_scratch), ctx);
|
||||
emit_udiv(r_A, r_A, r_scratch, ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X:
|
||||
update_on_xread(ctx);
|
||||
|
@ -223,10 +223,11 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
|
||||
}
|
||||
PPC_DIVWU(r_A, r_A, r_X);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A = reciprocal_divide(A, K); */
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K */
|
||||
if (K == 1)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
PPC_LI32(r_scratch1, K);
|
||||
/* Top 32 bits of 64bit result -> A */
|
||||
PPC_MULHWU(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
|
||||
PPC_DIVWU(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_AND_X:
|
||||
ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
|
||||
|
@ -371,11 +371,13 @@ static int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct sock_filter *filter,
|
||||
/* dr %r4,%r12 */
|
||||
EMIT2(0x1d4c);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A = reciprocal_divide(A, K) */
|
||||
/* m %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
|
||||
EMIT4_DISP(0x5c40d000, EMIT_CONST(K));
|
||||
/* lr %r5,%r4 */
|
||||
EMIT2(0x1854);
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K */
|
||||
if (K == 1)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* lhi %r4,0 */
|
||||
EMIT4(0xa7480000);
|
||||
/* d %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
|
||||
EMIT4_DISP(0x5d40d000, EMIT_CONST(K));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X: /* A %= X */
|
||||
jit->seen |= SEEN_XREG | SEEN_RET0;
|
||||
@ -391,6 +393,11 @@ static int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct sock_filter *filter,
|
||||
EMIT2(0x1854);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K: /* A %= K */
|
||||
if (K == 1) {
|
||||
/* lhi %r5,0 */
|
||||
EMIT4(0xa7580000);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* lhi %r4,0 */
|
||||
EMIT4(0xa7480000);
|
||||
/* d %r4,<d(K)>(%r13) */
|
||||
|
@ -497,9 +497,20 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_MUL_K: /* A *= K */
|
||||
emit_alu_K(MUL, K);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K */
|
||||
emit_alu_K(MUL, K);
|
||||
emit_read_y(r_A);
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K with K != 0*/
|
||||
if (K == 1)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
emit_write_y(G0);
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SPARC32
|
||||
/* The Sparc v8 architecture requires
|
||||
* three instructions between a %y
|
||||
* register write and the first use.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
emit_nop();
|
||||
emit_nop();
|
||||
emit_nop();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
emit_alu_K(DIV, K);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X: /* A /= X; */
|
||||
emit_cmpi(r_X, 0);
|
||||
|
@ -359,15 +359,21 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
|
||||
EMIT2(0x89, 0xd0); /* mov %edx,%eax */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K: /* A %= K; */
|
||||
if (K == 1) {
|
||||
CLEAR_A();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EMIT2(0x31, 0xd2); /* xor %edx,%edx */
|
||||
EMIT1(0xb9);EMIT(K, 4); /* mov imm32,%ecx */
|
||||
EMIT2(0xf7, 0xf1); /* div %ecx */
|
||||
EMIT2(0x89, 0xd0); /* mov %edx,%eax */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A = reciprocal_divide(A, K); */
|
||||
EMIT3(0x48, 0x69, 0xc0); /* imul imm32,%rax,%rax */
|
||||
EMIT(K, 4);
|
||||
EMIT4(0x48, 0xc1, 0xe8, 0x20); /* shr $0x20,%rax */
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: /* A /= K */
|
||||
if (K == 1)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
EMIT2(0x31, 0xd2); /* xor %edx,%edx */
|
||||
EMIT1(0xb9);EMIT(K, 4); /* mov imm32,%ecx */
|
||||
EMIT2(0xf7, 0xf1); /* div %ecx */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_AND_X:
|
||||
seen |= SEEN_XREG;
|
||||
|
@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
|
||||
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/unaligned.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/filter.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/reciprocal_div.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
|
||||
@ -166,7 +165,7 @@ unsigned int sk_run_filter(const struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
A /= X;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
|
||||
A = reciprocal_divide(A, K);
|
||||
A /= K;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X:
|
||||
if (X == 0)
|
||||
@ -553,11 +552,6 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
|
||||
/* Some instructions need special checks */
|
||||
switch (code) {
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
|
||||
/* check for division by zero */
|
||||
if (ftest->k == 0)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
ftest->k = reciprocal_value(ftest->k);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K:
|
||||
/* check for division by zero */
|
||||
if (ftest->k == 0)
|
||||
@ -853,27 +847,7 @@ void sk_decode_filter(struct sock_filter *filt, struct sock_filter *to)
|
||||
to->code = decodes[code];
|
||||
to->jt = filt->jt;
|
||||
to->jf = filt->jf;
|
||||
|
||||
if (code == BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When loaded this rule user gave us X, which was
|
||||
* translated into R = r(X). Now we calculate the
|
||||
* RR = r(R) and report it back. If next time this
|
||||
* value is loaded and RRR = r(RR) is calculated
|
||||
* then the R == RRR will be true.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* One exception. X == 1 translates into R == 0 and
|
||||
* we can't calculate RR out of it with r().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (filt->k == 0)
|
||||
to->k = 1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
to->k = reciprocal_value(filt->k);
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(reciprocal_value(to->k) != filt->k);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
to->k = filt->k;
|
||||
to->k = filt->k;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int sk_get_filter(struct sock *sk, struct sock_filter __user *ubuf, unsigned int len)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user