gpio: brcmstb: Use list_for_each_entry at appropriate places
Use list_for_each_entry to simplify the code a bit. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0d3c72ccb
commit
b178e7ead0
@ -233,17 +233,14 @@ static void brcmstb_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
|
||||
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
|
||||
struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(gc);
|
||||
struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
|
||||
struct list_head *pos;
|
||||
struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Interrupts weren't properly cleared during probe */
|
||||
BUG_ON(!priv || !chip);
|
||||
|
||||
chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
|
||||
list_for_each(pos, &priv->bank_list) {
|
||||
struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank =
|
||||
list_entry(pos, struct brcmstb_gpio_bank, node);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node)
|
||||
brcmstb_gpio_irq_bank_handler(bank);
|
||||
}
|
||||
chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -280,7 +277,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_sanity_check_banks(struct device *dev,
|
||||
static int brcmstb_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
|
||||
struct list_head *pos;
|
||||
struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -293,10 +289,9 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
* You can lose return values below, but we report all errors, and it's
|
||||
* more important to actually perform all of the steps.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
list_for_each(pos, &priv->bank_list) {
|
||||
bank = list_entry(pos, struct brcmstb_gpio_bank, node);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node)
|
||||
gpiochip_remove(&bank->gc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (priv->reboot_notifier.notifier_call) {
|
||||
ret = unregister_reboot_notifier(&priv->reboot_notifier);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user