From 06cd7a874ec6e09d151aeb1fa8600e14f1ff89f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Ott Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:08:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] s390/chsc: fix SEI usage on old FW levels Using a notification type mask for the store event information chsc is unsupported on some firmware levels. Retry SEI with that mask set to zero (which is the old way of requesting only channel subsystem related events). Cc: Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Haberland Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c index 9f0ea6cb6922..e3bf885f4a6c 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c @@ -541,18 +541,27 @@ static void chsc_process_sei_nt0(struct chsc_sei_nt0_area *sei_area) static void chsc_process_event_information(struct chsc_sei *sei, u64 ntsm) { - do { + static int ntsm_unsupported; + + while (true) { memset(sei, 0, sizeof(*sei)); sei->request.length = 0x0010; sei->request.code = 0x000e; - sei->ntsm = ntsm; + if (!ntsm_unsupported) + sei->ntsm = ntsm; if (chsc(sei)) break; if (sei->response.code != 0x0001) { - CIO_CRW_EVENT(2, "chsc: sei failed (rc=%04x)\n", - sei->response.code); + CIO_CRW_EVENT(2, "chsc: sei failed (rc=%04x, ntsm=%llx)\n", + sei->response.code, sei->ntsm); + + if (sei->response.code == 3 && sei->ntsm) { + /* Fallback for old firmware. */ + ntsm_unsupported = 1; + continue; + } break; } @@ -568,7 +577,10 @@ static void chsc_process_event_information(struct chsc_sei *sei, u64 ntsm) CIO_CRW_EVENT(2, "chsc: unhandled nt: %d\n", sei->nt); break; } - } while (sei->u.nt0_area.flags & 0x80); + + if (!(sei->u.nt0_area.flags & 0x80)) + break; + } } /* From 6e0de817594c61f3b392a9245deeb09609ec707d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Schwidefsky Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:53:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] s390/bpf,jit: initialize A register if 1st insn is BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH The A register needs to be initialized to zero in the prolog if the first instruction of the BPF program is BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH to prevent leaking the content of %r5 to user space. Cc: Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 9c36dc398f90..452d3ebd9d0f 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ static void bpf_jit_noleaks(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct sock_filter *filter) case BPF_S_LD_W_IND: case BPF_S_LD_H_IND: case BPF_S_LD_B_IND: - case BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH: case BPF_S_LD_IMM: case BPF_S_LD_MEM: case BPF_S_MISC_TXA: