sched/core: Fix ttwu() race
Paul reported rcutorture occasionally hitting a NULL deref: sched_ttwu_pending() ttwu_do_wakeup() check_preempt_curr() := check_preempt_wakeup() find_matching_se() is_same_group() if (se->cfs_rq == pse->cfs_rq) <-- *BOOM* Debugging showed that this only appears to happen when we take the new code-path from commit:2ebb177175
("sched/core: Offload wakee task activation if it the wakee is descheduling") and only when @cpu == smp_processor_id(). Something which should not be possible, because p->on_cpu can only be true for remote tasks. Similarly, without the new code-path from commit:c6e7bd7afa
("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu") this would've unconditionally hit: smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL); and if: 'cpu == smp_processor_id() && p->on_cpu' is possible, this would result in an instant live-lock (with IRQs disabled), something that hasn't been reported. The NULL deref can be explained however if the task_cpu(p) load at the beginning of try_to_wake_up() returns an old value, and this old value happens to be smp_processor_id(). Further assume that the p->on_cpu load accurately returns 1, it really is still running, just not here. Then, when we enqueue the task locally, we can crash in exactly the observed manner because p->se.cfs_rq != rq->cfs_rq, because p's cfs_rq is from the wrong CPU, therefore we'll iterate into the non-existant parents and NULL deref. The closest semi-plausible scenario I've managed to contrive is somewhat elaborate (then again, actual reproduction takes many CPU hours of rcutorture, so it can't be anything obvious): X->cpu = 1 rq(1)->curr = X CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 // switch away from X LOCK rq(1)->lock smp_mb__after_spinlock dequeue_task(X) X->on_rq = 9 switch_to(Z) X->on_cpu = 0 UNLOCK rq(1)->lock // migrate X to cpu 0 LOCK rq(1)->lock dequeue_task(X) set_task_cpu(X, 0) X->cpu = 0 UNLOCK rq(1)->lock LOCK rq(0)->lock enqueue_task(X) X->on_rq = 1 UNLOCK rq(0)->lock // switch to X LOCK rq(0)->lock smp_mb__after_spinlock switch_to(X) X->on_cpu = 1 UNLOCK rq(0)->lock // X goes sleep X->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE smp_mb(); // wake X ttwu() LOCK X->pi_lock smp_mb__after_spinlock if (p->state) cpu = X->cpu; // =? 1 smp_rmb() // X calls schedule() LOCK rq(0)->lock smp_mb__after_spinlock dequeue_task(X) X->on_rq = 0 if (p->on_rq) smp_rmb(); if (p->on_cpu && ttwu_queue_wakelist(..)) [*] smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL) cpu = select_task_rq(X, X->wake_cpu, ...) if (X->cpu != cpu) switch_to(Y) X->on_cpu = 0 UNLOCK rq(0)->lock However I'm having trouble convincing myself that's actually possible on x86_64 -- after all, every LOCK implies an smp_mb() there, so if ttwu observes ->state != RUNNING, it must also observe ->cpu != 1. (Most of the previous ttwu() races were found on very large PowerPC) Nevertheless, this fully explains the observed failure case. Fix it by ordering the task_cpu(p) load after the p->on_cpu load, which is easy since nothing actually uses @cpu before this. Fixes:c6e7bd7afa
("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu") Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200622125649.GC576871@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
This commit is contained in:
parent
740797ce3a
commit
b6e13e8582
@ -2293,8 +2293,15 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void *arg)
|
||||
rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
|
||||
update_rq_clock(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
llist_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, llist, wake_entry)
|
||||
llist_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, llist, wake_entry) {
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->on_cpu))
|
||||
smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(task_cpu(p) != cpu_of(rq)))
|
||||
set_task_cpu(p, cpu_of(rq));
|
||||
|
||||
ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, p->sched_remote_wakeup ? WF_MIGRATED : 0, &rf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2378,6 +2385,9 @@ static inline bool ttwu_queue_cond(int cpu, int wake_flags)
|
||||
static bool ttwu_queue_wakelist(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE) && ttwu_queue_cond(cpu, wake_flags)) {
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu == smp_processor_id()))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
sched_clock_cpu(cpu); /* Sync clocks across CPUs */
|
||||
__ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, cpu, wake_flags);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
@ -2528,7 +2538,6 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
success = 1;
|
||||
cpu = task_cpu(p);
|
||||
trace_sched_waking(p);
|
||||
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
|
||||
trace_sched_wakeup(p);
|
||||
@ -2550,7 +2559,6 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
|
||||
|
||||
/* We're going to change ->state: */
|
||||
success = 1;
|
||||
cpu = task_cpu(p);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure we load p->on_rq _after_ p->state, otherwise it would
|
||||
@ -2614,8 +2622,21 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
|
||||
* which potentially sends an IPI instead of spinning on p->on_cpu to
|
||||
* let the waker make forward progress. This is safe because IRQs are
|
||||
* disabled and the IPI will deliver after on_cpu is cleared.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Ensure we load task_cpu(p) after p->on_cpu:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
|
||||
* STORE p->cpu = @cpu
|
||||
* __schedule() (switch to task 'p')
|
||||
* LOCK rq->lock
|
||||
* smp_mb__after_spin_lock() smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu)
|
||||
* STORE p->on_cpu = 1 LOAD p->cpu
|
||||
*
|
||||
* to ensure we observe the correct CPU on which the task is currently
|
||||
* scheduling.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (READ_ONCE(p->on_cpu) && ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, cpu, wake_flags | WF_ON_RQ))
|
||||
if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) &&
|
||||
ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags | WF_ON_RQ))
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -2635,6 +2656,8 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
|
||||
psi_ttwu_dequeue(p);
|
||||
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
cpu = task_cpu(p);
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
||||
|
||||
ttwu_queue(p, cpu, wake_flags);
|
||||
@ -2642,7 +2665,7 @@ unlock:
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (success)
|
||||
ttwu_stat(p, cpu, wake_flags);
|
||||
ttwu_stat(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags);
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
|
||||
return success;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user