From b8212814d1e8428a082234223105e4071b844fab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:42:55 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: directly return 0 on no error code in btrfs_insert_raid_extent() It's more obvious to return a literal zero instead of "return ret;". Plus Smatch complains that ret could be uninitialized if the ordered_extent->bioc_list list is empty and this silences that warning. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c index 944e8f1862aa..9589362acfbf 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int btrfs_insert_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_put_bioc(bioc); } - return ret; + return 0; } int btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,