tick: Get rid of tick_period
The variable tick_period is initialized to NSEC_PER_TICK / HZ during boot and never updated again. If NSEC_PER_TICK is not an integer multiple of HZ this computation is less accurate than TICK_NSEC which has proper rounding in place. Aside of the inaccuracy there is no reason for having this variable at all. It's just a pointless indirection and all usage sites can just use the TICK_NSEC constant. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117132006.766643526@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
@@ -95,17 +95,17 @@ static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_t now)
|
||||
write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
|
||||
|
||||
delta = ktime_sub(now, tick_next_period);
|
||||
if (unlikely(delta >= tick_period)) {
|
||||
if (unlikely(delta >= TICK_NSEC)) {
|
||||
/* Slow path for long idle sleep times */
|
||||
s64 incr = ktime_to_ns(tick_period);
|
||||
s64 incr = TICK_NSEC;
|
||||
|
||||
ticks += ktime_divns(delta, incr);
|
||||
|
||||
last_jiffies_update = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update,
|
||||
incr * ticks);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
last_jiffies_update = ktime_add(last_jiffies_update,
|
||||
tick_period);
|
||||
last_jiffies_update = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update,
|
||||
TICK_NSEC);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Advance jiffies to complete the jiffies_seq protected job */
|
||||
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_t now)
|
||||
* pairs with the READ_ONCE() in the lockless quick check above.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(tick_next_period,
|
||||
ktime_add(last_jiffies_update, tick_period));
|
||||
ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update, TICK_NSEC));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Release the sequence count. calc_global_load() below is not
|
||||
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_restart(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
|
||||
hrtimer_set_expires(&ts->sched_timer, ts->last_tick);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Forward the time to expire in the future */
|
||||
hrtimer_forward(&ts->sched_timer, now, tick_period);
|
||||
hrtimer_forward(&ts->sched_timer, now, TICK_NSEC);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_HIGHRES) {
|
||||
hrtimer_start_expires(&ts->sched_timer,
|
||||
@@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_handler(struct clock_event_device *dev)
|
||||
if (unlikely(ts->tick_stopped))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
hrtimer_forward(&ts->sched_timer, now, tick_period);
|
||||
hrtimer_forward(&ts->sched_timer, now, TICK_NSEC);
|
||||
tick_program_event(hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer), 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz(void)
|
||||
next = tick_init_jiffy_update();
|
||||
|
||||
hrtimer_set_expires(&ts->sched_timer, next);
|
||||
hrtimer_forward_now(&ts->sched_timer, tick_period);
|
||||
hrtimer_forward_now(&ts->sched_timer, TICK_NSEC);
|
||||
tick_program_event(hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer), 1);
|
||||
tick_nohz_activate(ts, NOHZ_MODE_LOWRES);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart tick_sched_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
|
||||
if (unlikely(ts->tick_stopped))
|
||||
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
|
||||
|
||||
hrtimer_forward(timer, now, tick_period);
|
||||
hrtimer_forward(timer, now, TICK_NSEC);
|
||||
|
||||
return HRTIMER_RESTART;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1397,13 +1397,13 @@ void tick_setup_sched_timer(void)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Offset the tick to avert jiffies_lock contention. */
|
||||
if (sched_skew_tick) {
|
||||
u64 offset = ktime_to_ns(tick_period) >> 1;
|
||||
u64 offset = TICK_NSEC >> 1;
|
||||
do_div(offset, num_possible_cpus());
|
||||
offset *= smp_processor_id();
|
||||
hrtimer_add_expires_ns(&ts->sched_timer, offset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
hrtimer_forward(&ts->sched_timer, now, tick_period);
|
||||
hrtimer_forward(&ts->sched_timer, now, TICK_NSEC);
|
||||
hrtimer_start_expires(&ts->sched_timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED_HARD);
|
||||
tick_nohz_activate(ts, NOHZ_MODE_HIGHRES);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user