btrfs: Always use a cached extent_state in btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range
In case no cached_state argument is passed to btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range use one locally in the function. This optimises the case when an ordered extent is found since the unlock function will be able to unlock that state directly without searching for it again. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
23d31bd476
commit
bd80d94efb
@ -982,14 +982,26 @@ void btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
|
|||||||
struct extent_state **cached_state)
|
struct extent_state **cached_state)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
|
struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
|
||||||
|
struct extent_state *cachedp = NULL;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (cached_state)
|
||||||
|
cachedp = *cached_state;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
while (1) {
|
while (1) {
|
||||||
lock_extent_bits(tree, start, end, cached_state);
|
lock_extent_bits(tree, start, end, &cachedp);
|
||||||
ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(inode, start,
|
ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(inode, start,
|
||||||
end - start + 1);
|
end - start + 1);
|
||||||
if (!ordered)
|
if (!ordered) {
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* If no external cached_state has been passed then
|
||||||
|
* decrement the extra ref taken for cachedp since we
|
||||||
|
* aren't exposing it outside of this function
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (!cached_state)
|
||||||
|
refcount_dec(&cachedp->refs);
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
unlock_extent_cached(tree, start, end, cached_state);
|
}
|
||||||
|
unlock_extent_cached(tree, start, end, &cachedp);
|
||||||
btrfs_start_ordered_extent(&inode->vfs_inode, ordered, 1);
|
btrfs_start_ordered_extent(&inode->vfs_inode, ordered, 1);
|
||||||
btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
|
btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user