From beacff50edbd6c9659a6f15fc7f6126909fade29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eiichi Tsukata Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 04:16:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] rxrpc: Fix rxrpc_local leak in rxrpc_lookup_peer() Need to call rxrpc_put_local() for peer candidate before kfree() as it holds a ref to rxrpc_local. [DH: v2: Changed to abstract the peer freeing code out into a function] Fixes: 9ebeddef58c4 ("rxrpc: rxrpc_peer needs to hold a ref on the rxrpc_local record") Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211121041608.133740-2-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com/ # v1 --- net/rxrpc/peer_object.c | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c index 68396d052052..0298fe2ad6d3 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c @@ -299,6 +299,12 @@ static struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_create_peer(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, return peer; } +static void rxrpc_free_peer(struct rxrpc_peer *peer) +{ + rxrpc_put_local(peer->local); + kfree_rcu(peer, rcu); +} + /* * Set up a new incoming peer. There shouldn't be any other matching peers * since we've already done a search in the list from the non-reentrant context @@ -365,7 +371,7 @@ struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_lookup_peer(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, spin_unlock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock); if (peer) - kfree(candidate); + rxrpc_free_peer(candidate); else peer = candidate; } @@ -420,8 +426,7 @@ static void __rxrpc_put_peer(struct rxrpc_peer *peer) list_del_init(&peer->keepalive_link); spin_unlock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock); - rxrpc_put_local(peer->local); - kfree_rcu(peer, rcu); + rxrpc_free_peer(peer); } /* @@ -457,8 +462,7 @@ void rxrpc_put_peer_locked(struct rxrpc_peer *peer) if (n == 0) { hash_del_rcu(&peer->hash_link); list_del_init(&peer->keepalive_link); - rxrpc_put_local(peer->local); - kfree_rcu(peer, rcu); + rxrpc_free_peer(peer); } }