RISC-V: hwprobe: Expose Zba, Zbb, and Zbs
Add two new bits to the IMA_EXT_0 key for ZBA, ZBB, and ZBS extensions. These are accurately reported per CPU. Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509182504.2997252-4-evan@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
82e9c66e81
commit
c0baf32103
@ -64,6 +64,16 @@ The following keys are defined:
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C`: The C extension is supported, as defined
|
||||
by version 2.2 of the RISC-V ISA manual.
|
||||
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA`: The Zba address generation extension is
|
||||
supported, as defined in version 1.0 of the Bit-Manipulation ISA
|
||||
extensions.
|
||||
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB`: The Zbb extension is supported, as defined
|
||||
in version 1.0 of the Bit-Manipulation ISA extensions.
|
||||
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS`: The Zbs extension is supported, as defined
|
||||
in version 1.0 of the Bit-Manipulation ISA extensions.
|
||||
|
||||
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0`: A bitmask that contains performance
|
||||
information about the selected set of processors.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe {
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0 4
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD (1 << 0)
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C (1 << 1)
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA (1 << 2)
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB (1 << 3)
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS (1 << 4)
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0 5
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN (0 << 0)
|
||||
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED (1 << 0)
|
||||
|
@ -121,6 +121,46 @@ static void hwprobe_arch_id(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
|
||||
pair->value = id;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
|
||||
const struct cpumask *cpus)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
u64 missing = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
pair->value = 0;
|
||||
if (has_fpu())
|
||||
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD;
|
||||
|
||||
if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, c))
|
||||
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Loop through and record extensions that 1) anyone has, and 2) anyone
|
||||
* doesn't have.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
|
||||
struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu];
|
||||
|
||||
if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBA))
|
||||
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA;
|
||||
else
|
||||
missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBA;
|
||||
|
||||
if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBB))
|
||||
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB;
|
||||
else
|
||||
missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBB;
|
||||
|
||||
if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, ZBS))
|
||||
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS;
|
||||
else
|
||||
missing |= RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */
|
||||
pair->value &= ~missing;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
@ -164,13 +204,7 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0:
|
||||
pair->value = 0;
|
||||
if (has_fpu())
|
||||
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD;
|
||||
|
||||
if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, c))
|
||||
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C;
|
||||
|
||||
hwprobe_isa_ext0(pair, cpus);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0:
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user