sched/deadline: Fix lock pinning warning during CPU hotplug

The following warning can be triggered by hot-unplugging the CPU
on which an active SCHED_DEADLINE task is running on:

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3531 lock_release+0x690/0x6a0
  releasing a pinned lock
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x99/0xd0
   __warn+0xd1/0xf0
   ? dl_task_timer+0x1a1/0x2b0
   warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
   ? sched_clock+0x13/0x20
   lock_release+0x690/0x6a0
   ? enqueue_pushable_dl_task+0x9b/0xa0
   ? enqueue_task_dl+0x1ca/0x480
   _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40
   dl_task_timer+0x1a1/0x2b0
   ? push_dl_task.part.31+0x190/0x190
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3649 lock_unpin_lock+0x181/0x1a0
  unpinning an unpinned lock
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x99/0xd0
   __warn+0xd1/0xf0
   warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
   lock_unpin_lock+0x181/0x1a0
   dl_task_timer+0x127/0x2b0
   ? push_dl_task.part.31+0x190/0x190

As per the comment before this code, its safe to drop the RQ lock
here, and since we (potentially) change rq, unpin and repin to avoid
the splat.

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
[ Rewrote changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470274940-17976-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Wanpeng Li 2016-08-04 09:42:20 +08:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 6075620b05
commit c0c8c9fa21

View File

@ -658,8 +658,11 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
*
* XXX figure out if select_task_rq_dl() deals with offline cpus.
*/
if (unlikely(!rq->online))
if (unlikely(!rq->online)) {
lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie);
rq = dl_task_offline_migration(rq, p);
rf.cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock);
}
/*
* Queueing this task back might have overloaded rq, check if we need