ftrace: Clean up __seq_open_private() return check
The return status check of __seq_open_private() is rather strange: iter = __seq_open_private(); if (iter) { /* do stuff */ } return iter ? 0 : -ENOMEM; It makes much more sense to do the return of failure right away: iter = __seq_open_private(); if (!iter) return -ENOMEM; /* do stuff */ return 0; This clean up will make updates to this code a bit nicer. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b87965a1e
commit
c1bc5919f6
@ -3355,12 +3355,13 @@ ftrace_avail_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|||||||
return -ENODEV;
|
return -ENODEV;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
iter = __seq_open_private(file, &show_ftrace_seq_ops, sizeof(*iter));
|
iter = __seq_open_private(file, &show_ftrace_seq_ops, sizeof(*iter));
|
||||||
if (iter) {
|
if (!iter)
|
||||||
iter->pg = ftrace_pages_start;
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||||
iter->ops = &global_ops;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return iter ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
|
iter->pg = ftrace_pages_start;
|
||||||
|
iter->ops = &global_ops;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int
|
static int
|
||||||
@ -3369,13 +3370,14 @@ ftrace_enabled_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|||||||
struct ftrace_iterator *iter;
|
struct ftrace_iterator *iter;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
iter = __seq_open_private(file, &show_ftrace_seq_ops, sizeof(*iter));
|
iter = __seq_open_private(file, &show_ftrace_seq_ops, sizeof(*iter));
|
||||||
if (iter) {
|
if (!iter)
|
||||||
iter->pg = ftrace_pages_start;
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||||
iter->flags = FTRACE_ITER_ENABLED;
|
|
||||||
iter->ops = &global_ops;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return iter ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
|
iter->pg = ftrace_pages_start;
|
||||||
|
iter->flags = FTRACE_ITER_ENABLED;
|
||||||
|
iter->ops = &global_ops;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user