iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bridge: is PACKET_LOOPBACK unlikely()?

Browse Source 
While looking at using netdev_rx_handler_register for openvswitch Jesse
Gross suggested that an unlikely() might be worthwhile in that code.
I'm interested to see if its appropriate for the bridge code.

Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Simon Horman 2010-08-22 17:35:32 +00:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent fcb12fd223
commit c2368e795c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
net/bridge/br_input.c
View File

@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
int (*rhook)(struct sk_buff *skb);
if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK)
if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK))
return skb;
if (!is_valid_ether_addr(eth_hdr(skb)->h_source))