drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison
Although we're converting our workarounds to use a revid->stepping lookup table, the function that detects pre-production hardware should continue to compare against PCI revision ID values directly. These are listed in the bspec as integers, so it's easier to confirm their correctness if we just use an integer literal rather than a symbolic name anyway. Bspec: 13620, 19131, 13626, 18329 Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
db47fe727e
commit
c314b69395
@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ static void intel_detect_preproduction_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
||||
bool pre = false;
|
||||
|
||||
pre |= IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv);
|
||||
pre |= IS_SKL_REVID(dev_priv, 0, SKL_REVID_F0);
|
||||
pre |= IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_B_LAST);
|
||||
pre |= IS_KBL_GT_STEP(dev_priv, 0, STEP_A0);
|
||||
pre |= IS_GLK_REVID(dev_priv, 0, GLK_REVID_A2);
|
||||
pre |= IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x6;
|
||||
pre |= IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0xA;
|
||||
pre |= IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x1;
|
||||
pre |= IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x3;
|
||||
|
||||
if (pre) {
|
||||
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "This is a pre-production stepping. "
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user